Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #31240

Re: About concurrency and functional programming

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2/27/2015 6:45 PM, Ramine wrote:
> You will notice that "Bartosz Milewski" is saying that object oriented
> programming is not composable in presence of concurrency... but i think
> he is not correct... because what you can do is write near the
> property's interface(and don't forget to use set and get) and the
> methods that they are thread-safe, so when you you will inherit from the
> parent class, you will just read near the interface of the parent's
> class wich one is thread-safe and you will take that into account when
> you will compose by ineritance, and i think that this is easy to do
> and that it's efficient and no need for functional programming.

... Wow... I had known you were an idiot when you thought that Delphi 
was topical in a Java newsgroup, but you've managed to prove yourself 
more idiotic by thinking that composition and inheritance are the same 
thing.

I don't know where you learned object-oriented programming, but however 
much it cost you was a waste of money if you passed without being able 
to distinguish between composition and inheritance.

And, for the record, to see why Bartosz was right, I invite you to write 
code that can swap the head elements of two lists in a thread-safe 
manner, independent of the lists' implementation details (e.g., suppose 
was the result of Collections.synchronizedList and the other was a 
java.util.Vector). If you believe it can be done, then, boy, do I have a 
bargain-rate bridge I can sell you.


-- 
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not 
tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: About concurrency and functional programming Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-02-28 12:56 -0600
  Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-02-28 21:26 +0000
    Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-02-28 21:28 -0500
      Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 08:41 +0000
        Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2015-03-01 12:34 +0100
          Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 14:26 +0000
            Re: About concurrency and functional programming Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2015-03-01 15:30 +0100
              Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 14:31 +0000
            Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 14:30 +0000
            Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-03-01 11:29 -0500
              Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 17:07 +0000
                Re: About concurrency and functional programming Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2015-03-01 20:12 +0100
                Re: About concurrency and functional programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-03-01 20:31 +0000
                Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-03-01 16:13 -0500
                Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-03-01 16:11 -0500
                Re: About concurrency and functional programming Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-03-01 16:17 -0500
    Re: About concurrency and functional programming Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-03-01 12:03 -0600

csiph-web