Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #31197

About software quality and programming

Show key headers only | View raw

Hello...

I was thinking more, and i have noticed that you haven't agreed with
me that my parallel varfiler can be called an invention... and that 
other of my programming projects are inventions too, but anyway my 
inventions have to be judged  on the critera of "quality" i think, and 
speaking about software "quality", i have to define what's the 
"criterions" that allow us to judge software quality, we have the 
following criterons that permit us to judge software quality:

- Reliability
- Efficiency
- Security
- Maintainability
- Identifying critical programming errors
- and portability
- expressivness

But i have to be frank with you, what i have found difficult is when
only one individual must fulfill the goal alone of attaining a high 
level degree of software quality , i mean when you are implementing a 
programming project alone , you have to take into account all the above 
criteria alone, and to fullfil the most important goal of programming 
that is a high degree of "quality" alone... but when you are working in 
a team , the manager of the team has to divide the work efficiently 
between members of the team so that each one have not to take into 
account all the above criteria alone, but has to fullfil this goal only 
for some of the above criterions, so that programming becomes much 
easier and efficient, this is what i have tried to achieve alone by 
implementing my parallel varfiler,  so the question is then: does my 
parallel varfiler fulfill this goal of a high degree of software quality 
? i think that my parallel varfiler is good, cause on the criterion of 
reliability it is good, cause it is stable and it is even fault tolerant 
to power failures, and to "disk full" errors etc.
and on the criterion of efficiency it is good also, because it is fast
and efficient, and on the criterion of maintainability, it is good also, 
because it is easy to maintain, and on the criteria of expressivness it 
is good also, cause my parallel varfiler is
a parallel hashtable that works from the memory and it can also work 
from memory and from the hardisk, and you can easily save manually the 
parallel hashtable to a hardisk's file, or you can configure parallel 
varfiler to save "automaticly" your keys and corresponding datas to a 
hardisk's file at realtime, i mean when you call update() or delete() or 
add()... it can do it at realtime on memory and on the hardisk's file, 
and my parallel varfiler is a parallel hashtable that uses lock striping 
so it is good... and on the portability criterion my parallel varfiler 
is portable to other operating systems such us windows, linux and MacOSX 
on x86 systems. This is why i have told you that you will not find this 
concept that i have designed and called parallel varfiler
on C++ and C# or Java, if you are not convinced , can you show me
were my parallel varfiler has been implemented on C++ or C# or Java ?
so this is why i have told you that my parallel varfiler is a good 
candidate to be called an invention, and i think that my other projects 
such us my parallel conjugate gradient linear system solver library that 
is cache-aware and scalable on NUMA architecture, and my other projects 
and inventions too , are good also...


You can download my projects from here:

https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/



Thank you for your time.


Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

About software quality and programming Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2015-02-23 15:46 -0800
  Re: About software quality and programming Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org> - 2015-02-24 11:43 +0100
    Re: About software quality and programming Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-02-24 13:07 +0100
      Re: About software quality and programming Robbie Brown <rob@example.com> - 2015-02-24 20:22 +0000

csiph-web