Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #31038

Re: Is the API of JavaFX pixel-based?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Is the API of JavaFX pixel-based?
Date	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 12:14:49 +0000 (UTC)
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	10
Message-ID	<mat2fp$f4a$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<pixels-20150203115719@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <mar0ji$7hp$1@dont-email.me> <mari2b$mhm$2@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Date	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 12:14:49 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e5160e2be48f1ea550cf61512446f525"; logging-data="15498"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/NyDOS52G3BtVJNhBcgUNLl/jYutn+T74="
User-Agent	Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:C+ItuvJo4UocXbrwk/3mduO5Ze0=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:31038

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 06:28:28 +0800, Richard Maher wrote:

> Isn't he just asking "Why not EMs (or other) rather than PXs?"

Dunno. In any case, this is a more or less useful workround.

-- 
martin@   | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org       |

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Is the API of JavaFX pixel-based? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-02-03 17:30 +0000
  Re: Is the API of JavaFX pixel-based? Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> - 2015-02-04 06:28 +0800
    Re: Is the API of JavaFX pixel-based? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-02-04 12:14 +0000

csiph-web