Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30302
| From | "Bob(but not" THAĊ˘ "Bob)" <nobody@nowhere.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? |
| Date | 2014-11-07 08:48 +0000 |
| Organization | Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com |
| Message-ID | <m3i11c$jlt$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <m3g1qp$m3j$1@dont-email.me> <m3gam2$dp7$1@news.albasani.net> <m3gr7o$h5o$1@news.albasani.net> <m3gs9q$6gr$1@dont-email.me> <m3guv8$oql$1@news.albasani.net> |
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:07:26 +0100, Jan Burse wrote: > but for a better switch statement, a better compilation I wouldn't know > where to lookup this annotation. And even if the Hotspot JVM can do it, > probably my Dalvik JVM will not do it, to conserve battery life, it will > do no JITing at all. That's a false economy: whatever CPU cycle associated battery consumption is saved up front by not JITting, more is lost running interpreted instead of JITted code down the line in many instances. Anyway I heard that Dalvik is obsolete and being replaced by something called ART, which the source I read implied will be JITting.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-10-22 10:18 -0700
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-10-24 11:10 +0200
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-11-05 04:36 -0800
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2014-11-05 08:23 -0800
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-11-05 20:47 +0100
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2014-11-05 17:32 -0800
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-05 21:37 -0500
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2014-11-05 20:00 -0800
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-05 23:32 -0500
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-11-06 08:48 +0100
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-11-06 15:09 +0100
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-06 09:50 -0500
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-11-06 18:21 +0100
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-11-06 18:34 +0100
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-11-06 23:03 +0100
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-11-06 17:21 -0500
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-11-07 00:07 +0100
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? "Bob(but not" THAĊ˘ "Bob)" <nobody@nowhere.net> - 2014-11-07 08:48 +0000
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-11-08 11:28 +0100
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-11-20 03:12 -0800
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-11-20 13:24 +0100
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-11-20 19:06 +0100
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-11-20 22:54 +0100
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-22 08:54 +0100
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Brixomatic <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-22 09:19 +0100
Re: Java 7 vs 8 speed issues on Win7? Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2014-11-29 07:44 +0000
csiph-web