Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #28183

Re: 64-bit hashing function

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: 64-bit hashing function
Date Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:39:51 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 19
Message-ID <lj62g9$8df$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <kfh8l9p1hhphqv5l62am7if9bhnotfse6j@4ax.com> <5354c699$0$6708$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <45i9l9tq8ng6dk1lbfoc97tcj5gbd09iu7@4ax.com> <5354f836$0$6715$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <34kal9pept6fvrf6226lbcpe9j03nd5eh7@4ax.com> <lj3p1i$clm$1@dont-email.me> <bvpbl9pd4803b76uadq52t5l6sdnq3stre@4ax.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:39:53 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="9358cda03e1e0dfd3c4b757daa608707"; logging-data="8623"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ZMGoWhENVqQaUzJukAVUoER70RH0IDJo="
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
In-Reply-To <bvpbl9pd4803b76uadq52t5l6sdnq3stre@4ax.com>
Cancel-Lock sha1:zZxJegRzT+p5tTz+eRMM7xUR5bk=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:28183

Show key headers only | View raw

On 4/21/2014 8:55 PM, Roedy Green wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:46:06 -0700, markspace
> <markspace@nospam.nospam> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone
> who said :
>
>> Numbering package names == hard to remember.  Use a better name for
>> what's common in this package other than "17".
>
> it refer to common code that needs JDK 1.7 or higher to run.
>
> I used several of them 11 13 15, but now I have dropped the older
> ones.
>


Hmm, this was not obvious and is a lot more sensible.  I retract my 
previous criticism.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-20 15:15 -0700
  Re: 64-bit hashing function Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-04-20 19:37 -0400
  Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-20 22:18 -0700
  Re: 64-bit hashing function Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2014-04-21 09:19 +0200
    Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-21 00:51 -0700
      Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-21 02:05 -0700
        Re: 64-bit hashing function taqmcg@gmail.com - 2014-04-21 11:49 -0700
          Re: 64-bit hashing function taqmcg@gmail.com - 2014-04-21 12:01 -0700
        Re: 64-bit hashing function wolfgang zeidler <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-04-22 20:42 +0200
      Re: 64-bit hashing function Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2014-04-21 12:51 +0200
        Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-21 06:31 -0700
          Re: 64-bit hashing function Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2014-04-21 16:40 +0200
            Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-21 20:45 -0700
              Re: 64-bit hashing function Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2014-04-22 09:46 +0200
        Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-21 06:38 -0700
          Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-21 06:55 -0700
        Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-21 10:09 -0700
          Re: 64-bit hashing function markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-04-21 11:46 -0700
            Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-21 20:55 -0700
              Re: 64-bit hashing function markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-04-22 08:39 -0700
            Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-21 20:56 -0700
            Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-21 21:05 -0700
              Re: 64-bit hashing function markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-04-22 08:15 -0700
            Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-25 02:29 -0700
          Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-21 20:53 -0700
          Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-08 10:12 -0700
            Re: 64-bit hashing function Simon Lewis <simonlewis2001@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 21:27 +0200
  Re: 64-bit hashing function rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2014-04-23 09:57 +0100
    Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-25 04:08 -0700
      Re: 64-bit hashing function Mike Amling <mamling@chaff.us> - 2014-05-05 11:03 -0500
        Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-29 16:00 -0700
        Re: 64-bit hashing function Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-29 16:16 -0700

csiph-web