Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26608
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Patrick Roemer <sangamon@netcologne.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: can this be done with generics? |
| Date | Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:59:29 +0100 |
| Organization | news.netcologne.de |
| Lines | 52 |
| Distribution | world |
| Message-ID | <l6ve31$4r8$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnl9580s.42s.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | xdsl-78-35-78-104.netcologne.de |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | newsreader4.netcologne.de 1385380769 4968 78.35.78.104 (25 Nov 2013 11:59:29 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@netcologne.de |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:59:29 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100411 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <slrnl9580s.42s.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:26608 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Responding to Andreas Leitgeb:
> class Foo {
> public Foo foo1() {
> /* do something very interesting ... */
> return this;
> }
> // assume there were like 100 such foo#() methods here
> // (in practice they of course have more diverse names)
> }
> class Bar extends Foo {
> public Bar bar() {
> /* do something very interesting */
> return this;
> }
> }
[...]
> // but if I start with a Bar, and eventually after some foo#() calls
> // want to call method bar() which is not in Foo, then I'm out of luck:
> new Bar().foo1().foo42().foo84().bar(); // doesn't work, of course!
>
> Is there a way to use *generics* for the methods of class Foo such that
> each foo#() returns the *static* type on which the compiler saw it
> applied?
Just a naive attempt... Not sure if this matches your use case and
requirements - this will only work for a one-level hierarchy with an
abstract root class and will probably require some ugly gymnastics
inside the Foo method implementations:
abstract class Foo<T extends Foo<T>> {
protected abstract T self();
public T foo1() {
return self();
}
}
class Bar extends Foo<Bar> {
public Bar bar() {
return this;
}
@Override
protected Bar self() {
return this;
}
}
Best regards,
Patrick
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
can this be done with generics? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-11-25 00:55 +0000
Re: can this be done with generics? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-11-24 21:11 -0500
Re: can this be done with generics? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-11-25 01:43 -0800
Re: can this be done with generics? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-11-25 01:47 -0800
Re: can this be done with generics? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-11-26 21:32 -0500
Re: can this be done with generics? Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-11-25 11:30 +0100
Re: can this be done with generics? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-11-25 02:36 -0800
Re: can this be done with generics? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-11-25 10:45 +0000
Re: can this be done with generics? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-11-26 21:35 -0500
Re: can this be done with generics? Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-11-27 10:48 +0100
Re: can this be done with generics? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-11-27 10:18 +0000
Re: can this be done with generics? Patrick Roemer <sangamon@netcologne.de> - 2013-11-25 12:59 +0100
Re: can this be done with generics? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-11-25 22:31 +0100
Re: can this be done with generics? Patrick Roemer <sangamon@netcologne.de> - 2013-11-26 12:03 +0100
Re: can this be done with generics? v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2013-11-26 21:32 +0000
Re: can this be done with generics? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-11-26 23:30 +0100
Re: can this be done with generics? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-11-27 18:53 +0000
Re: can this be done with generics? Sebastian <news@seyweiler.dyndns.org> - 2013-11-28 22:28 +0100
Re: can this be done with generics? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-11-30 14:21 +0000
Re: can this be done with generics? Mike Amling <mamling@chaff.us> - 2013-11-25 09:02 -0600
Re: can this be done with generics? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-11-26 01:04 +0000
Re: can this be done with generics? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-11-26 08:16 +0100
Re: can this be done with generics? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-11-26 20:42 +0000
Re: can this be done with generics? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-11-26 21:38 -0500
Re: can this be done with generics? Mike Amling <mamling@chaff.us> - 2013-11-27 11:05 -0600
Re: can this be done with generics? taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-11-25 08:36 -0800
Re: can this be done with generics? taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-11-25 09:04 -0800
Re: can this be done with generics? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-11-26 00:50 +0000
Re: can this be done with generics? Arivald <NOSPAMarivald@interia.pl> - 2013-11-26 07:10 +0100
Re: can this be done with generics? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-11-27 18:58 +0000
Re: can this be done with generics? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-12-07 09:04 -0800
Re: can this be done with generics? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-12-07 19:20 +0000
Re: can this be done with generics? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-12-10 11:14 -0800
csiph-web