Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26576
| From | Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: the true literal |
| Date | 2013-11-22 11:07 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <l6nvi4$1vt$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <true-20131122032105@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <l6mmac$g1o$1@dont-email.me> <l6nq6v$134$1@dont-email.me> |
On 11/22/2013 09:37 AM, Eric Sosman wrote: > On 11/21/2013 11:23 PM, Jeff Higgins wrote: >> [...] >> 3.9. Keywords >> >> 50 character sequences, formed from ASCII letters, are reserved for use >> as keywords and cannot be used as identifiers (ยง3.8). >> >> Keyword: one of >> abstract continue for new switch >> assert default if package synchronized >> boolean do goto private this >> break double implements protected throw >> byte else import public throws >> case enum instanceof return transient >> catch extends int short try >> char final interface static void >> class finally long strictfp volatile >> const float native super while > > Note the absence of `null' from this list. The situation > seems very similar to that of `true' and `false': all three > are "literals" rather than "keywords". These literals happen > to be spelled entirely with letters rather than with arcane > symbol clusters like `314.159e-2', but they're still "literals". > > To me, this seems a good example of a "difference that makes > no difference" -- but a hair-splitting literal-ist (sorry) might > find a difference just so he can feel smug about it. > I wish I had found <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserved_word> before I had first responded to the OP. I think it will be a satisfactory answer to his question. In general discussion, including usenet, a hair-splitting literal-ist (ok?) stance can be taken, and motivated by smug. Specification writers, compiler writers, general purpose program writers,and others might have other motivations. I'm certain that Stefan Ram was not seeking an answer to his question in preparation to take a smug stance in some discussion. My motivation to respond to Stefan's question was not smug, even if it appeared hair-splitting and literalist. Other respondents have not come off as smug to me. The (online) Free Dictionary has literalist as a noun and literalistic as an adjective.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: the true literal Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-11-21 23:23 -0500
Re: the true literal Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-11-21 23:54 -0500
Re: the true literal Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-11-22 07:55 -0500
Re: the true literal Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-11-22 09:37 -0500
Re: the true literal Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-11-22 11:07 -0500
Re: the true literal Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-11-22 11:53 -0500
Re: the true literal Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-11-22 12:11 -0500
Re: the true literal Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-11-22 12:24 -0500
Re: the true literal Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-11-22 12:37 -0500
Re: the true literal Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-11-22 13:08 -0500
Re: the true literal Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-11-22 13:33 -0500
Re: the true literal Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-11-22 14:39 -0500
Re: the true literal Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2013-11-22 17:38 -0500
[OT] Re: the true literal Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-11-22 17:59 -0500
Re: the true literal Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-11-23 16:27 +0000
Re: the true literal Sebastian <news@seyweiler.dyndns.org> - 2013-11-23 21:24 +0100
Re: the true literal Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-11-23 21:23 +0000
Re: the true literal Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-11-27 13:51 -0800
csiph-web