Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26286
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: static data for methods... |
| Date | Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:44:28 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 23 |
| Message-ID | <l36avv$86i$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnl5ape4.mol.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <l367f1$iqm$1@dont-email.me> <slrnl5da03.mol.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:44:32 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d13404d57b2028fe1900165c7807070a"; logging-data="8402"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18jz3PNLDqFi5axNqDosrBm" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 |
| In-Reply-To | <slrnl5da03.mol.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:PBH2BENg0/aep8YPCct3AJ2X+k0= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:26286 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2013-10-10 15:13, Andreas Leitgeb allegedly wrote: > Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> wrote: >> On 2013-10-09 16:18, Andreas Leitgeb allegedly wrote: >>> I'm aware that in Java, methods cannot have static data within >>> them. The usual "workaround" is to place static data for a >>> method in static fields of the class. However, I need the >>> static fields lexically separated for the methods. >> Quick Q: is this you trying to be economical while doing a refactoring, >> or you designing a FUBAR'd mess? > > The former is close enough. The latter is its inevitable result. > > PS: I expected this (entirely justified) question would come up. *Shudder*. Anyway, for my two cents, I'd consider two avenues: a static map where the methods pick their fields (perhaps IdentityHashMap) or, if the performance hit is a concern, perhaps a custom annotation and an annotation parser that would inject the fields into the source code pre-compilation (I'm pretty sure that's possible, although I don't remember how exactly). -- DF.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
static data for methods... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-10-09 14:18 +0000
Re: static data for methods... taqmcg@gmail.com - 2013-10-09 07:49 -0700
Re: static data for methods... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-10-09 15:42 +0000
Re: static data for methods... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-10-09 15:29 +0000
Re: static data for methods... Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-10-10 14:44 +0200
Re: static data for methods... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-10-10 13:13 +0000
Re: static data for methods... Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-10-10 15:44 +0200
Re: static data for methods... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-10-10 17:26 +0000
Re: static data for methods... Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2013-10-11 22:03 -0700
Re: static data for methods... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2013-10-18 15:31 +0000
csiph-web