Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #24000

Re: The invokeLater loop

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: The invokeLater loop
Date Fri, 10 May 2013 14:51:51 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 9
Message-ID <kmjpuu$33s$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <invokeLater-loop-20130510204735@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Fri, 10 May 2013 21:48:14 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="fba3415ba68d85d643935af2f52f0b4b"; logging-data="3196"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+VAz29+p7CEiU0+3ZOsZLrxscncdLd5Ac="
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
In-Reply-To <invokeLater-loop-20130510204735@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Cancel-Lock sha1:vLZr1OU2QDNmPghcEcZQoMB5MSE=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:24000

Show key headers only | View raw


On 5/10/2013 11:54 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
>
>    Maybe it provides a way to loop while still allowing
>    Swing events to be processed in parallel? (So you do not
>    always have to spawn another thread besides the EDT.)

Swing events can't be processed in parallel, they're run on a single thread.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The invokeLater loop ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2013-05-10 18:54 +0000
  Re: The invokeLater loop Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-05-10 12:18 -0700
    Re: The invokeLater loop Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-05-10 14:26 -0700
    Re: The invokeLater loop Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-05-10 23:28 +0200
    Re: The invokeLater loop Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-10 17:39 -0400
    Re: The invokeLater loop Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-10 23:50 +0200
  Re: The invokeLater loop markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-05-10 14:51 -0700
  Re: The invokeLater loop Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2013-05-11 00:26 +0200
    Re: The invokeLater loop Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2013-05-10 15:52 -0700
  Re: The invokeLater loop Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-05-10 23:27 -0700
    Re: The invokeLater loop "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 19:44 +1000
  Re: The invokeLater loop Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-01-30 20:48 -0800

csiph-web