Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27098
| From | "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | <keywords-20131228171259@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <l9n026$7to$1@dont-email.me> <keywords-20131228181648@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
| Subject | Re: literals and keywords |
| Date | 2013-12-28 17:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hqGdnX-5w61DlyLPnZ2dnUVZ7sednZ2d@bt.com> (permalink) |
Stefan Ram wrote:
> Just as
> the keyword »this« names a value, the keyword »true« would
> name a value. So, when they have decided to call »this« a
> keyword, but not »true«, does it matter? Is there any point
> where it helps to know that »this« is a keyword, but »true«
> is not?
I think the distinction is of more use to compiler (and other tool) creators[*]
than to common-or-garden programmers.
The same can be said of the whole of the spec.
-- chris
[*] And, of course, to pedant-class language specialists.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: literals and keywords markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-12-28 08:59 -0800
Re: literals and keywords "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-12-28 17:28 +0000
Re: literals and keywords markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-12-28 10:56 -0800
Re: literals and keywords Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-12-28 14:53 -0500
Re: literals and keywords markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-12-28 12:41 -0800
Re: literals and keywords Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-12-28 16:36 -0500
csiph-web