Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27098

Re: literals and keywords

From "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
References <keywords-20131228171259@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <l9n026$7to$1@dont-email.me> <keywords-20131228181648@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Subject Re: literals and keywords
Date 2013-12-28 17:28 +0000
Message-ID <hqGdnX-5w61DlyLPnZ2dnUVZ7sednZ2d@bt.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Stefan Ram wrote:
>  Just as
>  the keyword »this« names a value, the keyword »true« would
>  name a value. So, when they have decided to call »this« a
>  keyword, but not »true«, does it matter? Is there any point
>  where it helps to know that »this« is a keyword, but »true«
>  is not?

I think the distinction is of more use to compiler (and other tool) creators[*] 
than to common-or-garden programmers.

The same can be said of the whole of the spec.

    -- chris

[*] And, of course, to pedant-class language specialists. 

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: literals and keywords markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-12-28 08:59 -0800
  Re: literals and keywords "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-12-28 17:28 +0000
  Re: literals and keywords markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-12-28 10:56 -0800
    Re: literals and keywords Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-12-28 14:53 -0500
      Re: literals and keywords markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-12-28 12:41 -0800
        Re: literals and keywords Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-12-28 16:36 -0500

csiph-web