Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #33805
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 05:03 -0800 |
| References | (1 earlier) <n95lhr$oak$1@reader1.panix.com> <7305d452-ad5e-4bc5-8305-097fe334332c@googlegroups.com> <n98r50$sp4$4@reader1.panix.com> <94bd553a-fad3-4812-9ded-8ba1137505aa@googlegroups.com> <n9sddg$cej$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| Message-ID | <e69134c8-3858-491e-a5d4-43df538ae099@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Checked Exceptions in Java |
| From | Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> |
On Monday, February 15, 2016 at 6:39:46 AM UTC-5, ruben wrote: > On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 21:47:36 -0800, Lew wrote: > > > Nice engineering argument there. > > > It was, but you missed it. Although considering how poorly Java is > engineered from the ground up, I doubt that it make any difference. > > But here is the funny part, there are no engineering problems, only human > ones. > > I guess you missed that class in into to engineering school .... Poorly engineered? Why are there so many trolls in this forum just stopping in to say they dislike Java entirely and would prefer a different language? Find your other language, hang out in their forum. Checked exceptions are always better than unchecked exceptions when handled properly. Poor handling by any particular developer(s) is not a reason to dislike checked exceptions. I have had a job with nightly support, and I would much rather the program know to expect errors and know something it can do about them than get that call at 2am to say someone's program stopped working. Every language with the power to do anything useful is going to have programmers writing poor code, and even the largest corporations let inexperienced developers put that code into production without a senior developer reviewing it first.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Checked Exceptions in Java ruben <ceo@iran.gov> - 2016-02-06 20:37 +0000
Re: Checked Exceptions in Java Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 13:45 -0800
Re: Checked Exceptions in Java ruben <ceo@iran.gov> - 2016-02-08 01:31 +0000
Re: Checked Exceptions in Java Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 21:47 -0800
Re: Checked Exceptions in Java ruben <ceo@iran.gov> - 2016-02-15 11:39 +0000
Re: Checked Exceptions in Java Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 05:03 -0800
Re: Checked Exceptions in Java ruben <ceo@iran.gov> - 2016-02-15 11:42 +0000
Re: Checked Exceptions in Java Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 05:34 -0800
Re: Checked Exceptions in Java ruben <ceo@iran.gov> - 2016-02-15 11:41 +0000
Re: Checked Exceptions in Java ruben <ceo@iran.gov> - 2016-02-15 11:44 +0000
Re: Checked Exceptions in Java Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 05:33 -0800
csiph-web