Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35983

Re: "Double.toString"

Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Date	2016-11-28 05:34 -0800
References	<Double-toString-20161119164723@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <o0s8u2$rj6$1@dont-email.me> <1u072gaozj278$.dlg@kimmeringer.de> <9a71ae21-aa0e-4ee6-930f-b7b871a8d7cc@googlegroups.com> <1gcla4rjhg12u.dlg@kimmeringer.de>
Message-ID	<d81eb79f-bee8-46b6-912a-fe59fc72b1b8@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: "Double.toString"
From	Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 8:07:09 AM UTC-5, Lothar Kimmeringer > 
> IMHO
> myString = "" + myDouble
> is less readable than
> myString = Double.toString(myDouble);
> But that's IMHO, YMMV

On simple assignment I'd prefer the myString = Double.toString(myDouble).
On method calls, particularly multiple concatenation I favor the +
myObject.callMethod(myDouble1 + " / " + myDouble2)

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: "Double.toString" Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-11-20 08:37 -0500
  Re: "Double.toString" Lothar Kimmeringer <news200709@kimmeringer.de> - 2016-11-20 22:49 +0100
    Re: "Double.toString" Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-11-21 08:25 -0500
    Re: "Double.toString" lewbloch@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 15:10 -0800
      Re: "Double.toString" Lothar Kimmeringer <news200709@kimmeringer.de> - 2016-11-24 14:07 +0100
        Re: "Double.toString" Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-11-24 11:12 -0500
        Re: "Double.toString" lewbloch@gmail.com - 2016-11-27 08:16 -0800
        Re: "Double.toString" Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 05:34 -0800

csiph-web