Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #28567

Re: NIO not so hot

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: NIO not so hot
Date Mon, 26 May 2014 20:14:44 +0200
Lines 24
Message-ID <buheklF870tU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <t24en9putph3mbnulkveghdjbrnisp105h@4ax.com> <btrkdnFjc3qU1@mid.individual.net> <btrkeiFjc3qU2@mid.individual.net> <btrme9Fjp4lU1@mid.individual.net> <bts7pqFne9dU1@mid.individual.net> <7gs5o912idp4au3skqgivf1lhgulte0h07@4ax.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net 0sLD7sIjr7cNHcmGJNo1bA54TOx5wnO1nHRhuf1jiAnNH1v5w=
Cancel-Lock sha1:TvkEU5LEXCY0eyNlWVPI2zRtEMw=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
In-Reply-To <7gs5o912idp4au3skqgivf1lhgulte0h07@4ax.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:28567

Show key headers only | View raw

On 26.05.2014 09:51, Roedy Green wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2014 19:09:13 +0200, Robert Klemme
> <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
> someone who said :
>
>>   - Adding byte buffering to IO does not help, rather it makes
>>     things slower.
>
> That is what you would expect because NIO is doing its own byte
> buffering, so an extra layer just gets in the way.

IO - not NIO!

> However for ordinary i/o I discovered allocating your space 50:50 to
> the byte and char buffer was optimal.

This is contrary to what my results show.  Did you look at them or run 
the tests yourself?

Regards

	robert

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

NIO not so hot Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-17 04:28 -0700
  Re: NIO not so hot Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-18 13:38 +0200
    Re: NIO not so hot Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-18 13:38 +0200
      Re: NIO not so hot Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-18 14:12 +0200
        Re: NIO not so hot Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-18 19:09 +0200
          Re: NIO not so hot Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-26 00:51 -0700
            Re: NIO not so hot Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-26 20:14 +0200
    Re: NIO not so hot Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-26 01:15 -0700
    Re: NIO not so hot Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-05-26 01:24 -0700
      Re: NIO not so hot Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-26 23:50 +0200
  Re: NIO not so hot Rupert Smith <rupertlssmith@googlemail.com> - 2014-05-31 02:29 -0700
    Re: NIO not so hot Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-06-01 12:15 +0200
      Re: NIO not so hot Rupert Smith <rupertlssmith@googlemail.com> - 2014-06-02 07:37 -0700
        Re: NIO not so hot Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2014-06-03 23:07 +0200
          Re: NIO not so hot Rupert Smith <rupertlssmith@googlemail.com> - 2014-06-06 01:32 -0700
      Re: NIO not so hot Rupert Smith <rupertlssmith@googlemail.com> - 2014-06-02 07:46 -0700

csiph-web