Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38573

Re: Java Version

Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Date 2018-08-28 16:00 -0700
References <bcd36cad-88e8-486c-bbf7-0e55b70e7038@googlegroups.com> <pm4hb9$sld$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Message-ID <bfbc8f79-d072-4c0e-b277-047a050e3ae7@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Java Version
From bursejan@gmail.com

Show all headers | View raw


Or you compile your Java byte code to JavaScript via:

CheerpJ 1.1 released Faster Java to JavaScript 
with better interop, exception handling, resource preloading
https://medium.com/leaningtech/cheerpj-1-1-released-3aca70c5b2da

A few days I had the dilemma, whether I should
discontinue my applets or not, and then I gave
it a try via their Chrome plugin:

Preview: Prolog Applets in Chrome Browser without Java.
https://plus.google.com/+JanBurse/posts/1a5GtGdf8Uf

I was very surprised I could run a end-to-end test,
everything worked fine, even the Swing GUI of the
applet, and not a single good old JVM was

installed in the browser. But I can tell yet of
the overall performance. I am still prepating
an applet console so that I can more

easily run some further benchmarks...

P.S.: I dont like the method proliferation in
JDK 7 etc.., even in java.lang.*, there is no
discipline of javax.* anymore, which

has the only effect, if you are not careful,
you suddently lock your self into a certain
higher JDK version. I still try to develop

against JDK 6, so that I also can use my
code for example Android. Oracle is really
creepy how they extend java.lang.*

with all kind of nonsense...

Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2018 00:12:11 UTC+2 schrieb Arne Vajhøj:
> On 8/28/2018 4:17 PM, Eric Douglas wrote:
> > What Java version do you run?  Do you code for a business?  What size?
> > 
> > I saw this article yesterday.
> > https://jaxenter.com/java-influencers-series-part-3-148682.html
> > They ask if everyone is planning to upgrade to 11 just because it's about to be the only version with long term support.
> > 
> > My current business is a small business.  We started on 6 and moved to 7 and 8 because it was a pretty smooth transition.  9+ sounds like a lot more work, so we plan to move to 11 for the LTS but could be awhile before we fit that into our schedule.
> > 
> > I saw a job ad for a Java developer for a large business and they mentioned Java 6... They also mentioned Oracle software so no doubt they have a paid long term support contract for that..
> 
> The SUN/Oracle policy has always been that if you pay you can get
> support for a very long time, but that patches for free stopped after
> some years.
> 
> Java 6
> 
> Release December 2006
> Free: end patches June 2013 (+7 years)
> Paid: end extended support December 2018 (+12 years)
> 
> Java 7
> 
> Release July 2011
> Free: end patches May 2015 (+4 years)
> Paid: end extended support July 2022 (+11 years)
> 
> Java 8
> 
> Release March 2014
> Free: end patches January 2019 for commercial (+5 years)
> Paid: end extended support March 2025 (+11 years)
> 
> Java 11
> 
> Release September 2018
> Free: Oracle refer to OpenJDK
>          openjdk.java.net will supposedly not offer long term support
>          adoptopenjdk.net will per https://adoptopenjdk.net/support.html 
> provide patches until September 2022 (+4 years)
> Paid: end extended support September 2026 (+8 years)
> 
> I think that the viable route forward for many Java users will be to:
> * continue with free Oracle Java 8 until January
> * upgrade to OpenJDK 11 from adoptopenjdk.net
> 
> The alternative must be to pay.
> 
> But if that is the choice then I would make sure to get quotes
> from other vendors like IBM and Azul before buying from Oracle to
> make sure you get the best price.
> 
> Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Java Version Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 13:17 -0700
  Re: Java Version Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2018-08-28 18:11 -0400
    Re: Java Version bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 16:00 -0700
      Re: Java Version bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 16:01 -0700
      Re: Java Version Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2018-08-28 19:40 -0400
      Re: Java Version Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2018-08-28 19:42 -0400
        Re: Java Version bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 16:56 -0700
          Re: Java Version bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 16:58 -0700
            Re: Java Version bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 17:06 -0700
              Re: Java Version bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 17:09 -0700
                Re: Java Version bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 17:28 -0700
                Re: Java Version bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 17:47 -0700
                Re: Java Version bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 17:53 -0700

csiph-web