Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #29814
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:17:18 -0500 |
| From | "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | <dsq7v99vkeccc2ueq2e0dlfnllttd7dr31@4ax.com> <6dv7v9p4lrb9fv2h6g9kft59dhum8pnqn3@4ax.com> <PxUIv.2$Ub6.1@fx20.iad> <s37bv9djiegrv31a73fgju9h2aljl2rl9t@4ax.com> <53f7a3bc$0$295$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Subject | Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released |
| Date | Sat, 23 Aug 2014 02:18:59 +0100 |
| X-Priority | 3 |
| X-MSMail-Priority | Normal |
| X-Newsreader | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 |
| X-RFC2646 | Format=Flowed; Response |
| X-MimeOLE | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 |
| Message-ID | <bcKdnc-CjKwDdmrOnZ2dnUVZ8rCdnZ2d@bt.com> (permalink) |
| Lines | 24 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| X-AuthenticatedUsername | NoAuthUser |
| X-Trace | sv3-7sxaozl+NWDCQFbw7wnzeEJMUW36ngLoZpn+9IQolezPDpjGFwfDOxD5Of+dxNRrhuUm1j5UGiKn7mc!GIF482p6BlPiqz6zqkeFc5dhXxi676zMZVwi+k0z+jN3N58yEgHCYP6UEy0hnIYBUpfx7Sk4Nrs= |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@btinternet.com |
| X-DMCA-Complaints-To | abuse@btinternet.com |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2130 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:29814 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> > There also should be a set of sandboxes they can run in. The OS
> > enforces the sandbox. You then don't have to be so careful about
> > loading a little app that can only play with its own limited size
> > files and cannot print.
>
> MS introduced that concept 2 years ago. This is how Windows Store
> apps work on Windows 8.x+.
>
> I will consider it a big failure. It has definitely not caught
> on.
In what context has it not "caught on" ? As I understand it, that is the basic
security model of Android (can't speak for Apple stuff). Oh, and Android got
there before MS (or at least got there > 2 years ago).
And I /seriously/ doubt whether Android was the first.
Come to that I /seriously/ doubt whether the model is sufficiently strong.
-- chris
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-08-19 17:32 -0700
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-08-19 18:47 -0700
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-08-19 23:24 -0400
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-08-19 20:54 -0700
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-08-20 09:24 -0400
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-08-21 00:20 -0700
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released thinbluernime <thinbluernime3@gmail.com> - 2014-08-21 15:11 +0000
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-08-22 16:10 -0400
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-08-23 02:18 +0100
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-08-22 21:32 -0400
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-08-22 16:10 -0400
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-08-21 00:20 -0700
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-08-21 23:54 -0400
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-08-21 10:18 +0200
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-08-21 05:37 -0400
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2014-08-21 11:43 +0200
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-08-22 16:12 -0400
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-08-20 00:32 -0700
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-08-20 09:45 -0400
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-08-20 08:22 -0700
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-08-20 08:28 -0700
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-08-20 13:20 -0400
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-08-21 01:53 +0200
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-08-21 08:42 -0700
Re: JDK 1.8.0_20 and JDK 1.7.0_67 released Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-08-20 09:39 -0700
csiph-web