Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #34314
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-17 04:55 -0700 |
| References | <nhesp7$hn7$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <a6a4c649-e30f-4a18-b8a3-6d1a722ab572@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough |
| From | Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> |
On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 6:49:48 AM UTC-4, Duncan Idaho wrote:
> I have a set of characters S of cardinality C
> example
> if S = {a..z, 0..9, A..Z} then C = er, um ..,62.
>
> For any given result string X, X need not be a set.
>
> eg if L = 8 then
> "abcdefgh", "AAAAAAAA", "AABBCCDD" are all valid values for X
>
> how many strings of length L are possible from S
If a..z + 0..9 + A..Z are valid characters for each position of a string, that's 62 possible characters. The number of possible combinations is 62 to the L (length) power.
The simplest example is binary. If each character may be 1 or 0, string of 3 characters is 2 * 2 * 2 = 8
000
001
010
100
011
110
111
101
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mathematics, Java, good enough Duncan Idaho <duncan@dunenoemail.com> - 2016-05-17 11:49 +0100
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 04:55 -0700
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Nigel Wade <nmw@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2016-05-17 12:56 +0100
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Nigel Wade <nmw@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2016-05-17 13:06 +0100
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Duncan Idaho <duncan@dunenoemail.com> - 2016-05-17 13:29 +0100
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-05-17 09:54 -0400
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough FredK <fred.l.kleinschmidt@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 07:17 -0700
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough FredK <fred.l.kleinschmidt@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 07:29 -0700
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-05-17 10:58 -0400
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Duncan Idaho <duncan@dunenoemail.com> - 2016-05-17 18:10 +0100
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-05-17 14:02 -0400
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-05-17 14:10 -0400
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 11:36 -0700
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-05-17 16:12 -0400
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 13:56 -0700
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-05-17 14:13 -0700
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Duncan Idaho <duncan@dunenoemail.com> - 2016-05-18 05:06 +0100
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-05-17 08:25 -0400
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-05-17 12:24 +0000
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Duncan Idaho <duncan@dunenoemail.com> - 2016-05-17 18:15 +0100
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-05-17 13:33 -0400
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-05-17 14:09 -0400
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-05-17 14:17 -0700
Re: Mathematics, Java, good enough Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-05-17 17:49 -0400
csiph-web