Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #28322
| From | "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | <mfnfl997i947ir4hae8fil7d60hnthg63m@4ax.com> <53583247$0$2956$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <GO-dnaGkR7OrdcHOnZ2dnUVZ7o2dnZ2d@bt.com> <JavaScript-Security-20140427200029@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <JavaScript-20140429065729@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
| Subject | Re: Java vs JavaScript |
| Date | 2014-05-01 08:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <G9udndYaBNn0YfzOnZ2dnUVZ8tidnZ2d@bt.com> (permalink) |
Stefan Ram wrote:
> So, JavaScript is not mentionend in the press because it is
> a technical details of the browser, while Java is a
> freestanding product, not part of the browser. Because of
> this avoidance of the mentioning of JavaScript, some people
> do believe that JavaScript today has become more secure. But
> you can find the technical details I quoted above if you
> search for them.
I think there's a lot of truth to that. A few years back, JavaScript was still
viewed with suspicion (justifiably), and as such it was a "live issue" and so,
when it was involved in security problems, it got mentioned. These days many
people take it for granted, and are no more likely to think of it as
"contributing to" an exploit where it is used than the surrounding HTML (if
any) is.
-- chris
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Java vs JavaScript Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-04-23 08:39 -0700
Re: Java vs JavaScript markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-04-23 09:10 -0700
Re: Java vs JavaScript Joshua Cranmer đ§ <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2014-04-23 15:48 -0500
Re: Java vs JavaScript Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-04-23 23:36 +0200
Re: Java vs JavaScript "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-04-27 12:20 +0100
Re: Java vs JavaScript Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> - 2014-04-27 20:05 +0800
Re: Java vs JavaScript Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-04-27 22:55 +0200
Re: Java vs JavaScript "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-05-01 08:52 +0100
Re: Java vs JavaScript Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-05-01 10:26 +0200
Re: Java vs JavaScript Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2014-05-01 14:10 -0700
Re: Java vs JavaScript Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-05-02 11:10 +0200
Re: Java vs JavaScript Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2014-05-02 10:20 -0700
Re: Java vs JavaScript Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-05-02 20:16 +0200
Re: Java vs JavaScript "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-05-04 10:38 +0100
Re: Java vs JavaScript Joshua Cranmer đ§ <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2014-05-05 00:16 -0500
Re: Java vs JavaScript Tim Slattery <tim@risingdove.com> - 2014-05-06 13:06 -0400
Re: Java vs JavaScript Joshua Cranmer đ§ <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2014-05-06 12:40 -0500
Re: Java vs JavaScript Simon Lewis <simonlewis2001@gmail.com> - 2014-05-02 12:53 +0200
Re: Java vs JavaScript Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-05-01 21:16 -0400
Re: Java vs JavaScript Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-05-02 11:17 +0200
Re: Java vs JavaScript Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-04-23 22:22 -0400
Re: Java vs JavaScript Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> - 2014-04-24 16:20 +0800
Re: Java vs JavaScript Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-04-29 21:07 -0400
Re: Java vs JavaScript Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> - 2014-04-24 16:15 +0800
Re: Java vs JavaScript lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-04-27 09:00 +0100
Re: Java vs JavaScript Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> - 2014-04-27 20:15 +0800
Re: Java vs JavaScript lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-04-27 16:59 +0100
Re: Java vs JavaScript Ray Osborne <rko153@gmail.com> - 2014-05-22 05:08 -0700
csiph-web