Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #27310
| From | Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: ephemeral ports [was: New Java JDK released] |
| References | (4 earlier) <52d70cf7$0$2891$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <lb72r1$on1$1@dont-email.me> <52d72450$0$2958$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <52d74f75$0$305$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <52d79398$0$2845$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> |
| Message-ID | <AwNBu.619$ol1.490@fx03.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Date | 2014-01-16 04:21 -0500 |
On 1/16/2014 3:08 AM, Silvio wrote: > On 01/16/2014 04:18 AM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> >> Are there any reason to believe that this change is platform specific? >> > > Yes. The so called "ephemeral port range" differs per Linux version/distro for example. I'm not sure about that. "ephemeral port" is not a defined term. I assume they mean the private (a.k.a. "dynamic") port range. This is defined in an RFC and by the IANA (<https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml>): <quote> ... Port numbers are assigned in various ways, based on three ranges: System Ports (0-1023), User Ports (1024-49151), and the Dynamic and/or Private Ports (49152-65535); the difference uses of these ranges is described in [RFC6335]. ... </quote> -- Wayne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New Java JDK released Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-01-14 21:45 -0800
Re: New Java JDK released "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2014-01-15 18:30 +1100
Re: New Java JDK released Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-01-15 03:37 -0800
Re: New Java JDK released Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-01-15 22:24 -0500
Re: New Java JDK released Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-01-16 12:41 +0100
Re: New Java JDK released Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-01-15 15:43 +0100
Re: New Java JDK released Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2014-01-15 21:28 +0200
Re: New Java JDK released markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-01-15 11:46 -0800
Re: New Java JDK released Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-01-15 23:34 +0100
Re: New Java JDK released markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-01-15 14:41 -0800
Re: New Java JDK released Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-01-16 01:14 +0100
Re: New Java JDK released Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-01-15 22:18 -0500
Re: New Java JDK released Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-01-16 09:08 +0100
Re: ephemeral ports [was: New Java JDK released] Wayne <nospam@all.invalid> - 2014-01-16 04:21 -0500
Re: ephemeral ports [was: New Java JDK released] Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-01-16 10:35 +0100
Re: ephemeral ports [was: New Java JDK released] lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-01-16 09:42 +0000
Re: New Java JDK released Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-01-16 09:29 -0800
Re: New Java JDK released Kevin McMurtrie <mcmurtrie@pixelmemory.us> - 2014-01-15 18:46 -0800
Re: New Java JDK released Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-01-16 08:50 +0100
Re: New Java JDK released Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-01-16 12:45 +0100
Re: New Java JDK released Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-01-16 13:05 +0100
Re: New Java JDK released Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-01-15 16:14 -0800
Re: New Java JDK released Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2014-01-16 01:19 +0100
Re: New Java JDK released Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-01-17 01:47 -0800
Re: New Java JDK released Michal Kleczek <michal_wytnijto@kleczek.org> - 2014-01-16 11:37 +0100
csiph-web