Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #36705
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: How to handle same sanity checks |
| Date | Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:31:23 +0200 |
| Organization | Decebal Computing |
| Lines | 26 |
| Message-ID | <871sqaojwk.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> (permalink) |
| References | <87o9tgo0a9.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <oiga3s$jrd$1@dont-email.me> <oih2hb$bad$1@Gaia.teknon.de> <87fuernwav.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <oij6h7$92f$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f007575c907e67c534b3e9f520a75a29"; logging-data="18556"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Z619BxHyobvb9+zZZXmnVVTu0d43DfBM=" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
| X-Homepage | http://www.decebal.nl/ |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:47M/LZTMzMNF7mW5ZHAtVKtECwU= sha1:DljUkR8pfjrs/lx6u2ppOke5840= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:36705 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Friday 23 Jun 2017 15:57 CEST, Eric Sosman wrote: > On 6/23/2017 12:48 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote: >> [... creates a Throwable, then alters the stack trace ...] >> >> The code is now more clear and easier to change, while the stack >> trace gives the right information. > > It's a matter of opinion, perhaps, but I'd say the stack trace > now gives the *wrong* information. Specifically, following the > trace to find where the Throwable came from leads to a dead end, > to a place where the Throwable did not arise and could not have > arisen. > > Now, you may hold that this is a "little white lie," but I > still believe it's a lie. Perhaps it's a little lie, but how > great will your lies grow before you draw the lyin'? You have a point. I need to think about that. Maybe I could add something to the message to clear it up. Another possibility would be to make it parameter driven. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How to handle same sanity checks Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-06-22 11:10 +0200
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-06-22 10:27 +0000
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-06-22 13:21 +0200
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-06-23 06:51 +0200
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2017-06-24 12:06 +0200
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-06-24 10:33 +0000
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2017-06-24 16:46 +0200
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-06-24 19:37 +0000
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-06-22 11:26 +0000
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-06-22 07:44 -0400
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-06-22 12:30 +0000
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-06-22 07:40 -0400
Re: How to handle same sanity checks v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2017-06-22 18:33 +0000
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-06-23 06:48 +0200
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-06-23 09:57 -0400
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-06-23 16:31 +0200
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-06-23 17:21 +0000
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 05:21 -0700
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-06-26 13:34 +0000
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-06-26 15:22 +0000
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-06-25 22:55 -0400
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2017-06-22 23:07 +0200
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2017-06-25 09:52 +0200
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2017-06-25 12:31 +0200
Re: How to handle same sanity checks Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-06-25 14:23 -0400
Style police (Was: Re: How to handle same sanity checks) Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-06-25 17:28 -0400
Re: Style police (Was: Re: How to handle same sanity checks) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-06-25 19:14 -0400
Re: Style police (Was: Re: How to handle same sanity checks) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-06-25 19:19 -0400
Re: Style police (Was: Re: How to handle same sanity checks) Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2017-06-26 23:34 +0200
csiph-web