Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #36705

Re: How to handle same sanity checks

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: How to handle same sanity checks
Date Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:31:23 +0200
Organization Decebal Computing
Lines 26
Message-ID <871sqaojwk.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> (permalink)
References <87o9tgo0a9.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <oiga3s$jrd$1@dont-email.me> <oih2hb$bad$1@Gaia.teknon.de> <87fuernwav.fsf@munus.decebal.nl> <oij6h7$92f$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f007575c907e67c534b3e9f520a75a29"; logging-data="18556"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Z619BxHyobvb9+zZZXmnVVTu0d43DfBM="
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
X-Homepage http://www.decebal.nl/
Cancel-Lock sha1:47M/LZTMzMNF7mW5ZHAtVKtECwU= sha1:DljUkR8pfjrs/lx6u2ppOke5840=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:36705

Show key headers only | View raw


On Friday 23 Jun 2017 15:57 CEST, Eric Sosman wrote:

> On 6/23/2017 12:48 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> [... creates a Throwable, then alters the stack trace ...]
>>
>> The code is now more clear and easier to change, while the stack
>> trace gives the right information.
>
> It's a matter of opinion, perhaps, but I'd say the stack trace
> now gives the *wrong* information.  Specifically, following the
> trace to find where the Throwable came from leads to a dead end,
> to a place where the Throwable did not arise and could not have
> arisen.
>
> Now, you may hold that this is a "little white lie," but I
> still believe it's a lie.  Perhaps it's a little lie, but how
> great will your lies grow before you draw the lyin'?

You have a point. I need to think about that. Maybe I could add
something to the message to clear it up. Another possibility would be
to make it parameter driven.

-- 
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

How to handle same sanity checks Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-06-22 11:10 +0200
  Re: How to handle same sanity checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-06-22 10:27 +0000
    Re: How to handle same sanity checks Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-06-22 13:21 +0200
    Re: How to handle same sanity checks Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-06-23 06:51 +0200
    Re: How to handle same sanity checks Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2017-06-24 12:06 +0200
      Re: How to handle same sanity checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-06-24 10:33 +0000
        Re: How to handle same sanity checks Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2017-06-24 16:46 +0200
          Re: How to handle same sanity checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-06-24 19:37 +0000
  Re: How to handle same sanity checks Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-06-22 11:26 +0000
    Re: How to handle same sanity checks Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-06-22 07:44 -0400
      Re: How to handle same sanity checks Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-06-22 12:30 +0000
  Re: How to handle same sanity checks Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-06-22 07:40 -0400
    Re: How to handle same sanity checks v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2017-06-22 18:33 +0000
      Re: How to handle same sanity checks Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-06-23 06:48 +0200
        Re: How to handle same sanity checks Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-06-23 09:57 -0400
          Re: How to handle same sanity checks Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2017-06-23 16:31 +0200
            Re: How to handle same sanity checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-06-23 17:21 +0000
              Re: How to handle same sanity checks Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-06-26 05:21 -0700
                Re: How to handle same sanity checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-06-26 13:34 +0000
                Re: How to handle same sanity checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-06-26 15:22 +0000
        Re: How to handle same sanity checks Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-06-25 22:55 -0400
  Re: How to handle same sanity checks Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2017-06-22 23:07 +0200
  Re: How to handle same sanity checks Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2017-06-25 09:52 +0200
  Re: How to handle same sanity checks Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2017-06-25 12:31 +0200
    Re: How to handle same sanity checks Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-06-25 14:23 -0400
      Style police (Was: Re: How to handle same sanity checks) Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-06-25 17:28 -0400
        Re: Style police (Was: Re: How to handle same sanity checks) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-06-25 19:14 -0400
        Re: Style police (Was: Re: How to handle same sanity checks) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-06-25 19:19 -0400
          Re: Style police (Was: Re: How to handle same sanity checks) Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2017-06-26 23:34 +0200

csiph-web