Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37868
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-12-18 12:35 -0800 |
| References | <ccc860e9-c9b6-453f-a7e8-658b832ebbe3@googlegroups.com> <p18va0$2c4$1@dont-email.me> <368c757c-d84e-4454-83a4-7072210c4344@googlegroups.com> <7542fb97-5c19-405b-b8b4-d6fc7f24103e@googlegroups.com> <p195vr$1p3$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Message-ID | <7655c9ff-4253-409c-bafc-55f0be9385ea@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection |
| From | Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> |
On Monday, December 18, 2017 at 2:47:27 PM UTC-5, Kiwi User wrote: > > > you misspelled parameterized a couple times. > > > I could say the same to you: -ised word endings are perfectly correct on > this side of the pond. Using -ized is American usage, not Queen's > English. Similarly, spelling 'sulphur' with an 'f' looks very wrong to > me. I don't know when or why these divergences happened, but the result > is that there are multiple legitimate spellings for some English words > and the better spell checkers will accept both or, preferably, default to > using the appropriate dictionary depending on your system's time zone. > Not sure what you mean, parameterize is a correct spelling. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/parameterize He spelled it parametrize.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Marcin Kuszczak <marcin.kuszczak@gmail.com> - 2017-12-18 03:44 -0800
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte.net> - 2017-12-18 18:52 +0100
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Marcin Kuszczak <marcin.kuszczak@gmail.com> - 2017-12-18 10:43 -0800
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-18 10:46 -0800
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-12-18 13:53 -0500
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-12-18 19:27 -0500
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-12-18 20:14 -0500
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-12-19 11:46 -0800
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-18 11:16 -0800
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Kiwi User <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2017-12-18 19:47 +0000
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-18 12:35 -0800
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Kiwi User <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2017-12-18 21:48 +0000
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-18 13:56 -0800
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Kiwi User <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2017-12-18 23:16 +0000
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-12-18 19:24 -0500
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Kiwi User <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2017-12-19 00:46 +0000
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Marcin Kuszczak <marcin.kuszczak@gmail.com> - 2017-12-18 13:22 -0800
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-18 13:29 -0800
Re: SDI - Simple Dependency Injection Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-12-19 08:24 -0800
csiph-web