Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #33242
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-29 23:05 -0800 |
| References | <Java-20151027231043@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <n0q3tc$2ln$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| Message-ID | <5261e594-af18-463c-8971-9781f23cbdd5@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Teaching "purely object-oriented" Java |
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
Manuel Collado wrote: > Well, you can avoid it. But consider that the unavoidable 'new' operator > is in fact a static method of the Object class. > > Just an opinion. The 'new' operator is not a method, static or otherwise, of any class. Just a fact. -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Teaching "purely object-oriented" Java Manuel Collado <m.collado@domain.invalid> - 2015-10-28 10:17 +0100
Re: Teaching "purely object-oriented" Java Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 23:05 -0800
Re: Teaching "purely object-oriented" Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-30 20:13 -0500
Re: Teaching "purely object-oriented" Java Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 16:30 -0800
csiph-web