Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #30483
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-12-04 06:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2db503bb-a8ea-478a-a623-d1ac65e6dbb7@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | shutdown executor service |
| From | mike <mikaelpetterson@hotmail.com> |
Hi,
I found the following code in our code base in the same class.
private final ExecutorService executor = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
List<Future<T>> startExcuting() {
try {
return executor.invokeAll(Lists.newArrayList(tasks));
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
throw new AppException("startExcuting interrupted", e);
} finally {
tasks.clear();
}
}
My question is: Should we not have executor.shutdown(); or threads might live longer. Is that correct?
//mike
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
shutdown executor service mike <mikaelpetterson@hotmail.com> - 2014-12-04 06:42 -0800 Re: shutdown executor service Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-12-04 10:00 -0500
csiph-web