Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #12160

Re: "Borrowing" code

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.chainon-marquant.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!74.125.46.80.MISMATCH!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From	Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: "Borrowing" code
Date	Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:27:26 -0800 (PST)
Organization	http://groups.google.com
Lines	65
Message-ID	<26067624.0.1329550046782.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcpl10> (permalink)
References	<Xns9FFB971CFBEEEjpnasty@94.75.214.39> <1848237.679.1329425962537.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbgq3> <Cs2dnY62Arv156DSnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@earthlink.com> <7l2rj71n2qk6kqf27dpv59tl7qi5tfmc42@4ax.com> <5368336.186.1329470502072.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbeo1> <tiatj7lnp2id6q3ni6dfin6s56j1ga8t0q@4ax.com> <21955541.159.1329508308005.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbgq3> <zYz%q.1162$mT1.281@newsfe09.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host	173.164.137.214
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace	posting.google.com 1329550047 28526 127.0.0.1 (18 Feb 2012 07:27:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:27:27 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To	<zYz%q.1162$mT1.281@newsfe09.iad>
Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.164.137.214; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T
User-Agent	G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client	true
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:12160

Show key headers only | View raw

On Friday, February 17, 2012 1:50:23 PM UTC-8, Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> On 12-02-17 03:51 PM, Lew wrote:
> > Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> >> Lew wrote:
> >>> It's too strong a conclusion, "freely" available. A tutorial's code very 
> >>> reasonably could be licensed only for personal use in service of learning the 
> >>> material in the tutorial. Presence in a tutorial is not presumptive evidence 
> >>> that code is licensed freely or in the public domain.
> >>
> >>      How would it be licenced without some sort of statement? 
> > 
> > Exactly so. It wouldn't be.
> > 
> > Mere presence in a tutorial is not a license.
> > 
> >> If there is no such statement, then the code is freely available.  
> > 
> > Wrong. In most jurisdictions, certainly in the U.S., all rights are reserved by 
> > default. Ergo if there is no statement of license, then the code is completely 
> > unavailable, outside fair use. 
> [ SNIP ]
> 
> What do you do if you can find essentially the same code, except for WS
> and variable names and such, on dozens of different websites?
> Acknowledge everyone?

What?  Huh?  "Essentially the same code, except for" the things that make it 
different under copyright law? Where's the problem?

> I'm not talking about plagiarism either. I'm talking about code snippets
> that, given a certain situation, really won't deviate from a certain
> form. Any adequate programmer, confronted with the same problem, would
> arrive at essentially the same expression. There are numerous examples
> of this on the Internet or in books or in magazines.

This is a question of law. What does the law say?

AIUI, if you copy the same expression as a copyright work without permission, 
you have violated the copyright. That's the law. You can play the "how many 
angels can dance on the head of a pin?" game all you want, but absent the 
particulars of a given case you're just playing with yourself.

> Code is not prose or poetry. That's why automatic copyright for source
> code is a flawed concept. Ideally people should have to explain why they
> think their code rates copyright. I understand that we shouldn't be
> flouting the current (broken) system, but we shouldn't be passively
> accepting it either.
> 
> I guarantee that each and every one of us writes code routinely,
> independently and without copy & paste and without reference to others'
> material, that could be attacked on the basis of copyright, simply
> because someone published something basic. Are you cool with that?

You could write a Harry Potter novel without seeing the original work, too. 
J.K. Rowling could then sue you, as her publishers have done, and you would 
lose. Are you cool with that?

Copyright exists to protect the expression of a work. It has value. It '
prevents others from profiting from the copyright holder's work without 
sharing the profit, or at least getting permission. Yes, I'm cool with that.

You should be, too.

-- 
Lew

Thread

"Borrowing" code Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-02-16 19:50 +0000
  Re: "Borrowing" code glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-02-16 20:28 +0000
  Re: "Borrowing" code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-16 12:59 -0800
    Re: "Borrowing" code Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-02-16 13:51 -0800
      Re: "Borrowing" code Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-02-16 15:03 -0800
        Re: "Borrowing" code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 01:21 -0800
          Re: "Borrowing" code Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-02-17 11:29 -0800
            Re: "Borrowing" code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 11:51 -0800
              Re: "Borrowing" code Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-02-17 17:50 -0400
                Re: "Borrowing" code glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-02-17 22:36 +0000
                Re: "Borrowing" code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 23:27 -0800
                Re: "Borrowing" code glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-02-18 15:11 +0000
                Re: "Borrowing" code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-18 10:28 -0800
                Re: "Borrowing" code glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-02-18 20:08 +0000
                Re: "Borrowing" code Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-02-18 16:46 -0400
                Re: "Borrowing" code BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-20 01:58 -0700
                Re: "Borrowing" code Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-02-18 13:03 -0400
                Re: "Borrowing" code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-18 10:31 -0800
                Re: "Borrowing" code glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-02-18 20:15 +0000
                Re: "Borrowing" code Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-02-19 19:46 -0800
                Re: "Borrowing" code Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-02-19 23:08 -0600
                Re: "Borrowing" code Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-02-20 09:17 -0800
                Re: "Borrowing" code Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> - 2012-02-20 09:32 +0000
                Re: "Borrowing" code Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-02-20 01:45 -0800
                Re: "Borrowing" code BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-20 08:35 -0700
                Re: "Borrowing" code Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-02-20 03:59 -0600
            Re: "Borrowing" code Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-17 17:00 -0500
              Re: "Borrowing" code Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2012-02-17 16:08 -0600
                Re: "Borrowing" code Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-17 17:14 -0500
            Re: "Borrowing" code George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2012-02-17 18:00 -0500
              Re: "Borrowing" code Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-02-17 21:54 -0400
          Re: "Borrowing" code Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-17 17:10 -0500
            Re: "Borrowing" code glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-02-17 22:42 +0000
              Re: "Borrowing" code Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-02-17 15:22 -0800
                Re: "Borrowing" code glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-02-18 01:37 +0000
                Re: "Borrowing" code Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-02-19 19:51 -0800
      Re: "Borrowing" code Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-02-16 23:37 +0000
      Re: "Borrowing" code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 01:26 -0800
    Re: "Borrowing" code Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-02-16 19:36 -0400
      Re: "Borrowing" code Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-02-16 22:15 -0600
      Re: "Borrowing" code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 01:41 -0800
    Re: "Borrowing" code Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-02-16 23:36 +0000
      Re: "Borrowing" code Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-16 18:42 -0500
  Re: "Borrowing" code BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-16 15:19 -0700
    Re: "Borrowing" code Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-02-16 23:50 +0000
      Re: "Borrowing" code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 01:57 -0800
        Re: "Borrowing" code Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-02-17 17:09 +0000
          Re: "Borrowing" code glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-02-17 18:45 +0000
            [OT] Harry Potter copyright claims (Was: "Borrowing" code) Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 11:00 -0800
              Re: [OT] Harry Potter copyright claims (Was: "Borrowing" code) Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-02-17 11:36 -0800
            Re: "Borrowing" code Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> - 2012-02-20 09:41 +0000
          Re: "Borrowing" code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 10:34 -0800
          Re: "Borrowing" code Bent C Dalager <bcd@pvv.ntnu.no> - 2012-02-18 00:08 +0000
  Re: "Borrowing" code Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-02-16 18:14 -0500
  Re: "Borrowing" code Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-16 18:37 -0500
    Re: "Borrowing" code Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-16 17:39 -0800
  Re: "Borrowing" code Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-02-16 20:34 -0500
  Re: "Borrowing" code Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-02-16 18:01 -0800
    Re: "Borrowing" code Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-16 21:18 -0500
    Re: "Borrowing" code Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-02-16 20:26 -0800
    Re: "Borrowing" code Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-02-16 20:32 -0800
    Re: "Borrowing" code BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-17 00:25 -0700
    Re: "Borrowing" code Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 02:01 -0800
    Re: "Borrowing" code Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> - 2012-02-17 11:36 +0000
  Was: "Borrowing" code -  Links for budding copyright lawyers Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-02-17 17:29 -0500
  Re: "Borrowing" code Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-02-20 19:22 +0000

csiph-web