Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #29597

in1To10

Show all headers | View raw

from the url

http://codingbat.com/prob/p137365

The problem states: "Given a number n, return true if n is in the range 1..10, inclusive. Unless "outsideMode" is true, in which case return true if the number is less or equal to 1, or greater or equal to 10."

Here is what I came up with...

public class In1to10 {
	static boolean in1To10(int n, boolean outsideMode) {
		
		if (outsideMode == false){
			if (n >= 1 && n <=10) {
				return true;
			}
		} else if (outsideMode == true){
			if (n <=1 || n >=10) {
				return true;
			}
		}
		
		return false;
	}
	public static void main(String[] args) {
		System.out.println(in1To10(5, false)); //true
		System.out.println(in1To10(11, false)); //false
		System.out.println(in1To10(11, true)); //true
	}//end main
}


Now upon googling the solutions, I saw some people use
if(outsideMode == false) 
if(outsideMode == true)

instead of using if(outsideMode == false)/else(outsideMode == true).

Would both catch all the cases? If not, which one would?

Chad

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

in1To10 cdalten@gmail.com - 2014-08-09 12:12 -0700
  Re: in1To10 Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-08-09 15:58 -0400
  Re: in1To10 Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-08-09 16:13 -0400
  Re: in1To10 Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2014-08-09 22:56 +0200
    Re: in1To10 Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-08-09 17:02 -0400
      Re: in1To10 Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2014-08-09 23:43 +0200
        Re: in1To10 Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-08-09 19:49 -0400
        Re: in1To10 Torsten Kirschner <torsten@kirschner.no> - 2014-08-10 16:59 +0200
          Re: in1To10 Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-08-10 11:33 -0400
            Re: in1To10 Torsten Kirschner <torsten@kirschner.no> - 2014-08-11 22:23 +0200
            Re: in1To10 Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2014-08-12 11:10 -0700
              Re: in1To10 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-08-19 16:54 -0400
                Re: in1To10 Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2014-08-20 10:36 -0700
            Re: in1To10 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-08-19 16:53 -0400
  Re: in1To10 cdalten@gmail.com - 2014-08-09 18:35 -0700
    Re: in1To10 Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-08-09 22:13 -0400
    Re: in1To10 Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-08-09 22:23 -0400
    Re: in1To10 Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-08-10 12:07 -0400
  Re: in1To10 Mike Amling <mamling@chaff.us> - 2014-08-10 00:29 -0500
  Re: in1To10 "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-08-10 13:53 +0100
    Re: in1To10 Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-08-10 09:48 -0400
      Re: in1To10 "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-08-10 15:01 +0100
        Re: in1To10 Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-08-10 10:32 -0400
          Re: in1To10 "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-08-10 15:53 +0100
  Re: in1To10 lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-08-10 14:07 +0100
  Re: in1To10, a simple test plan lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-08-10 16:43 +0100
    Re: in1To10, a simple test plan Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2014-08-10 12:01 -0400
      Re: in1To10, a simple test plan lipska the kat <lipskathekat@example.com> - 2014-08-10 17:41 +0100
      Re: in1To10, a simple test plan Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-08-19 16:57 -0400
  Re: in1To10 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-08-12 02:59 -0700

csiph-web