|
Subject
|
Author
|
Date [asc]
|
|
Re: gcc and gfortran 16.1 are released
|
"Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> |
2026-05-03 03:14 +0000 |
|
Rust programmers are 40YO virgins
|
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> |
2026-06-02 14:20 +0200 |
|
Re: gcc and gfortran 16.1 are released
|
JL <no-user@no-where> |
2026-06-06 20:51 -0400 |
|
Re: gcc and gfortran 16.1 are released
|
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
2026-06-07 04:26 +0000 |
|
native gfortran compiler for Windows on arm64
|
no-no <no-no@no-domain> |
2026-06-16 15:19 -0400 |
|
Re: native gfortran compiler for Windows on arm64
|
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
2026-06-17 03:13 +0000 |
|
Re: native gfortran compiler for Windows on arm64
|
makendo <makendo@makendo.invalid> |
2026-06-17 14:33 +0800 |
|
Fortran is old enough for the aged penison!
|
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> |
2026-06-27 11:22 +0200 |
|
Re: Fortran is old enough for the aged penison!
|
Gary Scott <garylscott@sbcglobal.net> |
2026-06-28 09:58 -0500 |
|
Graphics Processing with Fortran 77 (was: Re: Your strictness is your problem , not mine)
|
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
2026-07-29 18:10 +0800 |
|
I am not in C, it is theory and C++ [Hybrid Approaches from KOAN/Fortran-S]
|
Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
2026-07-29 12:45 +0200 |
|
Java picky concerning JIT-ing [Luckier with C++/C or FORTRAN compilers?] (Re: I am not in C, it is theory and C++ [Hybrid Approaches from KOAN/Fortran-S])
|
Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
2026-07-29 12:52 +0200 |
|
Pro Gauss-Jordan Reduction, Phigs and Phigs+ (was: Re: Chris M. Thomasson can ask 100 more questions (Re: Tablet and phone UBS-C remote debugging))
|
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
2026-08-03 02:27 +0800 |
|
Re: Pro Gauss-Jordan Reduction, Phigs and Phigs+
|
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
2026-08-03 02:35 +0800 |
|
Re: xkcd: Day Counter
|
Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> |
2026-08-21 18:45 +0000 |
|
Re: xkcd: Day Counter
|
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
2026-08-22 04:14 +0800 |
|
Re: xkcd: Day Counter
|
Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> |
2026-09-03 17:20 +0000 |
|
Re: xkcd: Day Counter
|
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
2026-09-04 12:42 +0800 |
|
Re: xkcd: Day Counter
|
Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> |
2026-09-04 17:49 +0000 |
|
Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?
|
"Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
2026-09-06 23:29 +0800 |
|
Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2026-09-06 15:32 +0000 |
|
Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?
|
"Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
2026-09-06 23:53 +0800 |
|
Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?
|
Cóilín Nioclásín Glostéir <thanks-to@Taf.com> |
2026-09-06 17:30 +0000 |
|
Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?
|
"David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> |
2026-09-06 18:40 +0000 |
|
Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2026-09-06 19:47 +0000 |
|
Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2026-09-06 19:49 +0000 |
|
Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?
|
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
2026-09-06 22:00 +0000 |
|
Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?
|
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
2026-09-07 10:48 +0800 |
|
Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?
|
"Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> |
2026-09-07 04:41 +0000 |
|
Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2026-09-07 05:08 +0000 |
|
Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?
|
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
2026-09-07 13:24 +0800 |
|
Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?
|
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
2026-09-07 06:47 +0000 |
|
Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?
|
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
2026-09-07 16:32 +0800 |
|
RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference
|
Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> |
2026-09-14 18:37 +0800 |
|
Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference
|
"Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
2026-09-14 22:44 +0800 |
|
Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference
|
"David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> |
2026-09-14 18:34 +0000 |
|
Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference
|
"Johann \"Myrkraverk\" Oskarsson" <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> |
2026-09-15 03:16 +0800 |
|
Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2026-09-14 19:49 +0000 |
|
Re: RAND versus CALL RANDOM_NUMBER teeny weeny difference
|
Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> |
2026-09-15 17:24 +0800 |
|
Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2
|
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> |
2026-09-21 18:29 -0500 |
|
Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2
|
Harold Stevens <wookie@bookworm.localdomain> |
2026-09-22 04:48 -0500 |
|
Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2
|
Harold Stevens <wookie@bookworm.localdomain> |
2026-09-22 04:58 -0500 |
|
Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2
|
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> |
2026-09-22 15:51 -0500 |
|
Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2026-09-24 16:14 +0000 |
|
Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2
|
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> |
2026-09-24 15:14 -0500 |
|
Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2
|
"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
2026-09-24 16:12 -0700 |
|
Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2
|
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
2026-09-24 23:58 +0000 |
|
Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2
|
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> |
2026-09-24 17:59 -0700 |
|
Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2
|
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
2026-09-25 06:29 +0000 |
|
Re: converting a 700,000+ line Fortran 77 plus 50,000+ line C++ program to C++, part 2
|
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
2026-09-25 14:53 +0000 |