Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #30663 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Clyde W. Phillips Jr." <cwpjr02@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-24 19:09 -0700 |
| Last post | 2014-05-27 00:59 -0700 |
| Articles | 4 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.forth
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Are Computer able to think? "Clyde W. Phillips Jr." <cwpjr02@gmail.com> - 2014-05-24 19:09 -0700
Re: Are Computer able to think? bruce axtens <bugmagnet@outlook.com> - 2014-05-25 13:52 +0000
Re: Are Computer able to think? "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-25 16:36 -0400
Re: Are Computer able to think? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-05-27 00:59 -0700
| From | "Clyde W. Phillips Jr." <cwpjr02@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-24 19:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Are Computer able to think? |
| Message-ID | <6421b27f-99b1-4534-93c2-c2354ce707d7@googlegroups.com> |
Regarding Artificial Intelligence: Computers that don't think have become far more dangerous. BIG meta data that can correlate to an individual and their group participation activity and habits can by real-time and parallel multivariate analysis be programmed to disrupt, control or defeat any individuals, social groups, business ventures, governmental and political activity. This is here and now.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bruce axtens <bugmagnet@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-25 13:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <llssis$sk9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #30663 |
We are yet to figure out how humans think, that is, how the brain works. When we figure that out, we'll be able to make computers do the same. We've been trying to understand ourselves for centuries and the deeper we dig the more complexity we find. I figure we need a few more centuries before we know ourselves well enough to build a thinking computer. My two bob. -- Bruce
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-25 16:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.xgfni2ko6zenlw@localhost> |
| In reply to | #30689 |
On Sun, 25 May 2014 09:52:29 -0400, bruce axtens <bugmagnet@outlook.com> wrote: > We are yet to figure out how humans think, that is, how the brain works. > When we figure that out, we'll be able to make computers do the same. I don't believe that's a necessary prerequisite. We could use DNA to produce a living computer without ever knowing how the brain portion of the DNA works. Or, we could effect similar functionality as the human mind in silicon without knowing fully how the human mind works. In either case, we don't need to know how the human mind works. Rod Pemberton
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-27 00:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <74865b4a-9c5e-4bda-b217-9794ee012b35@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #30713 |
On Sunday, 25 May 2014 21:36:28 UTC+1, Rod Pemberton wrote: > We could use DNA to produce a living computer without ever knowing > how the brain portion of the DNA works. Or, we could effect similar > functionality as the human mind in silicon without knowing fully how > the human mind works. In either case, we don't need to know how the > human mind works. > What... Like a brain? Just make a baby. There. Done. And it's fun, too :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.forth
csiph-web