Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #26487 > unrolled thread

Norton and WinForth

Started byCoos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl>
First post2013-10-14 01:32 +0200
Last post2013-10-15 16:27 -0700
Articles 5 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.forth


Contents

  Norton and WinForth Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-10-14 01:32 +0200
    Re: Norton and WinForth "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-10-14 03:29 -0400
    Re: Norton and WinForth josv@planet.nl - 2013-10-14 03:40 -0700
    Re: Norton and WinForth NortonSupport <vineethfromnorton@gmail.com> - 2013-10-14 09:39 -0700
      Re: Norton and WinForth George Hubert <georgeahubert@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-10-15 16:27 -0700

#26487 — Norton and WinForth

FromCoos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl>
Date2013-10-14 01:32 +0200
SubjectNorton and WinForth
Message-ID<1k8y2v1yqcvi7.c0x44rrlja7w.dlg@40tude.net>
Here we go again,

This time Norton Internet Security (on Windows Vists 32bit) judged that my
installation of Win32Forth 6.14.03 was not safe.
Luckily, reinstalling with the Setup of WinForth succeeded.

-- 
Coos

CHForth, 16 bit DOS applications
http://home.hccnet.nl/j.j.haak/forth.html 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#26493

From"Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com>
Date2013-10-14 03:29 -0400
Message-ID<op.w4xofsnw0e5s1z@localhost>
In reply to#26487
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 19:32:47 -0400, Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> wrote:

> Here we go again,
>

Yes, there was a thread a few years ago on this.  Supposedly,
it wasn't infected then.  Supposedly, the issue was fixed with
the next version too.

> This time Norton Internet Security (on Windows Vists 32bit)
> judged that my installation of Win32Forth 6.14.03 was not safe.
> Luckily, reinstalling with the Setup of WinForth succeeded.
>

Unfortunately, I found I had odd, virus-like problems with the
versions which were flagged as having a virus or malware etc.
This was despite claims from people here that they weren't
actually infected.  So, if a version of Win32Forth doesn't
pass the two scanners I execute, I won't use it.  I suggest
you don't use it either.


Rod Pemberton

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#26503

Fromjosv@planet.nl
Date2013-10-14 03:40 -0700
Message-ID<fafb826e-590f-4621-b11f-f544d53c2940@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#26487
Hi Coos,

In Win32Forth version 6.15.03 a number of changes were made to solve that issue.
I wonder if that is also true for you.
You can download Win32Forth version 6.15.03 from:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/win32forth/files/Win32Forth%20-%20developer%20release

Jos

On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 19:32:47 -0400, Coos Haak <chf...@hccnet.nl> wrote: 
> Here we go again,
> 
> 
> 
> This time Norton Internet Security (on Windows Vists 32bit) judged that my
> 
> installation of Win32Forth 6.14.03 was not safe.
> 
> Luckily, reinstalling with the Setup of WinForth succeeded.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Coos
> 
> 
> 
> CHForth, 16 bit DOS applications
> 
> http://home.hccnet.nl/j.j.haak/forth.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#26510

FromNortonSupport <vineethfromnorton@gmail.com>
Date2013-10-14 09:39 -0700
Message-ID<7bbd5514-fa28-4606-a250-53b35b48bf2b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#26487
On Monday, October 14, 2013 5:02:47 AM UTC+5:30, Coos Haak wrote:
> Here we go again,
> 
> 
> 
> This time Norton Internet Security (on Windows Vists 32bit) judged that my
> 
> installation of Win32Forth 6.14.03 was not safe.
> 
> Luckily, reinstalling with the Setup of WinForth succeeded.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Coos
> 
> 
> 
> CHForth, 16 bit DOS applications
> 
> http://home.hccnet.nl/j.j.haak/forth.html

Hello,

Sorry for the trouble. I am Vineeth and I am from the Norton Support team. 
If you think the file is safe, please submit it to us at http://www.Norton.com/fp so we can review it.

Thanks!

Vineeth
Norton Support

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#26567

FromGeorge Hubert <georgeahubert@yahoo.co.uk>
Date2013-10-15 16:27 -0700
Message-ID<59bcdf43-376c-4695-9a44-13d2f989bdfe@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#26510
On Monday, October 14, 2013 5:39:48 PM UTC+1, NortonSupport wrote:
> On Monday, October 14, 2013 5:02:47 AM UTC+5:30, Coos Haak wrote:
> 
> > Here we go again,
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > This time Norton Internet Security (on Windows Vists 32bit) judged that my
> 
> > 
> 
> > installation of Win32Forth 6.14.03 was not safe.
> 
> > 
> 
> > Luckily, reinstalling with the Setup of WinForth succeeded.
> 
> > Coos
>  
> > CHForth, 16 bit DOS applications 
> 
> > http://home.hccnet.nl/j.j.haak/forth.html
>  
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for the trouble. I am Vineeth and I am from the Norton Support team. 
> 
> If you think the file is safe, please submit it to us at http://www.Norton.com/fp so we can review it.
 
> Thanks!

> Vineeth
> 
> Norton Support

Should be fixed now 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.forth


csiph-web