Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #57836 > unrolled thread

Dropbox rant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.forth

Contents

  Dropbox rant Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-04-22 11:24 -0700
    Re: Dropbox rant Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-04-22 13:50 -0500
      Re: Dropbox rant Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2017-04-23 04:50 -0500
        Re: Dropbox rant Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2017-04-23 06:58 -0700
          Re: Dropbox rant foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-24 18:06 -0700
            Re: Dropbox rant Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 20:30 -0700
              Re: Dropbox rant foxaudioresearch@gmail.com - 2017-04-24 22:02 -0700
                Re: Dropbox rant "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-24 21:52 -1000
                Re: Dropbox rant Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 16:38 -0700
                  Re: Dropbox rant hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-25 16:55 -0700
              Re: Dropbox rant Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2017-05-28 17:50 -0700
            Re: Dropbox rant "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2017-04-24 21:26 -1000
              Re: Dropbox rant john <anon@example.com> - 2017-04-25 10:22 +0100
                Re: Dropbox rant lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 04:14 -0700
                Re: Dropbox rant hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-25 11:25 -0700
                  Re: Dropbox rant Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-26 15:57 +0100
                    Re: Dropbox rant Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-26 18:41 +0300
                      Re: Dropbox rant Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-04-26 17:59 +0100
                        Re: Dropbox rant Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-26 21:38 +0300
                          Re: Dropbox rant rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-26 17:48 -0400
                      Re: Dropbox rant hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-26 12:42 -0700
                        Re: Dropbox rant Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 06:57 +0300
                          Re: Dropbox rant hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-26 21:20 -0700
                            OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 07:45 +0300
                              Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 01:31 -0400
                                Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 08:43 +0300
                                  Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 01:56 -0400
                                  Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-27 13:17 -0700
                                    Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 16:31 -0400
                                    Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 07:48 +0300
                                  Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 10:22 +0300
                                    Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-30 11:09 +1000
                                      Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-29 21:52 -0700
                                        Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 08:24 +0300
                                          Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 01:54 -0400
                                            Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 09:04 +0300
                                              Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 02:19 -0400
                                                Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 00:41 -0700
                                                  Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 11:01 +0300
                                                    Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 01:24 -0700
                                                    Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 03:33 -0700
                                                      Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com - 2017-04-30 16:19 +0100
                                                      Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant) Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-04-30 16:46 -0500
                                                      Re: Dropbox rant "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-05-02 11:33 +1000
                                      Back on-topic: what attracted you to Forth?' (was: OT: Hugh's in need of help ...) Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 08:42 +0300

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#58209

On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 8:41:44 AM UTC-7, Ron Aaron wrote:
> On 26/04/2017 17:57, Alex wrote:
> > On 4/25/2017 19:25, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> >> (and I'm not enthusiastic about
> >> writing Straight Forth for free now).
> > 
> > Start paying yourself, make yourself indispensable and then -- kaboom --
> > ask for a raise.
> 
> Hey!  That's my business model!

Your business model is to live off of American foreign-aid money.

Your strategy with critics is to burn them alive with white-phosphorus.

> >> Alex McDonald has spent almost 4 years now saying that I have a
> >> "serious misunderstanding of how pointers work" because my array sort
> >> and my array definer allows arrays of structs --- *I haven't yet
> >> rewritten my array sort and my array definer to be restricted to only
> >> supporting arrays of cells* --- so apparently the endless flaming
> >> doesn't work as well as hoped.
> >>
> > 
> > There you go again. Seriously misunderstanding.
> 
> Not so!  He understands something other than what you've said, that's all.

Alex McDonald has been saying for almost four years that I don't know that it is possible to have an array of pointers to structs. Everybody understands this though --- it is taught in high-school.

The ANS-Forth cult's strategy with critics is to present a false dichotomy of themselves as total experts on Forth and the critics as being utterly ignorant of even the most basic concepts of programming.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58223

On 26/04/2017 22:42, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 8:41:44 AM UTC-7, Ron Aaron wrote:
>> On 26/04/2017 17:57, Alex wrote:
>>> On 4/25/2017 19:25, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> (and I'm not enthusiastic about
>>>> writing Straight Forth for free now).
>>>
>>> Start paying yourself, make yourself indispensable and then -- kaboom --
>>> ask for a raise.
>>
>> Hey!  That's my business model!
> 
> Your business model is to live off of American foreign-aid money.
> 
> Your strategy with critics is to burn them alive with white-phosphorus.

You're a fuckin' loony cunt, you know that?

Please get some psychiatric help before you hurt someone.  It's no
wonder "Straight Forth" hasn't seen the light of day yet, 5 or more
years on; it only exists in your paranoid delusional mind.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58226

On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 8:57:19 PM UTC-7, Ron Aaron wrote:
> On 26/04/2017 22:42, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 8:41:44 AM UTC-7, Ron Aaron wrote:
> >> On 26/04/2017 17:57, Alex wrote:
> >>> On 4/25/2017 19:25, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> (and I'm not enthusiastic about
> >>>> writing Straight Forth for free now).
> >>>
> >>> Start paying yourself, make yourself indispensable and then -- kaboom --
> >>> ask for a raise.
> >>
> >> Hey!  That's my business model!
> > 
> > Your business model is to live off of American foreign-aid money.
> > 
> > Your strategy with critics is to burn them alive with white-phosphorus.
> 
> You're a fuckin' loony cunt, you know that?
> 
> Please get some psychiatric help before you hurt someone.  It's no
> wonder "Straight Forth" hasn't seen the light of day yet, 5 or more
> years on; it only exists in your paranoid delusional mind.

There is a pattern here:

1.) Elizabeth Rather claims to be the "leading expert" of Forth, which implies that all other Forthers are inferior --- I find this offensive.

2.) The Israelis claim to be the "Chosen People of God,"  which implies that all other people are despised by God --- I find this offensive.

Both ANS-Forth and Judaism are cults --- in both cases they claim to be the standard for the entire world, and say that everybody else is a non-standard wanna-bee --- in both cases they quickly descend into flinging gross insults ("fuckin' loony cunt") at anybody who doubts their supposed superiority.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58227 — OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

On 27/04/2017 7:20, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:

> There is a pattern here:

Yes: you continue to make irrational ad-hominem attacks against everyone
who even slightly disagrees with you.  It's your peculiar psychosis.


> 2.) The Israelis claim to be the "Chosen People of God,"  which implies that all other people are despised by God --- I find this offensive.

No, Israelis don't make that claim.  So you're taking offense
unnecessarily; not that that will stop you.

Point of information: nobody gives a rat's ass what you find offensive,
in particular since you delight in being offensive to others.


> Both ANS-Forth and Judaism are cults --- in both cases they claim to be the standard for the entire world, and say that everybody else is a non-standard wanna-bee --- in both cases they quickly descend into flinging gross insults ("fuckin' loony cunt") at anybody who doubts their supposed superiority.

Not even close.

In the case of "Israelis", you're conflating "Israeli" and "Jewish". Of
course you are probably not aware, since you don't ever bother
researching anything, that 20% of Israeli citizens are not Jewish at all
(they're Christians and Moslems and Druze and some other religions
you've never heard of).  Of the remaining 80%, the majority is not
"religious". So "Israeli" != "Jewish".  That's just to begin with.

In the specific case of "Judaism", you're also wrong.  But answering
your paranoid delusions is pointless, so I encourage you to just look up
(from actual Jewish sources) what "Judaism" believes regarding non-Jews.
You may be surprised.

Of course, all this is ridiculously off-topic for CLF.  As usual.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58231 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

On 4/27/2017 12:45 AM, Ron Aaron wrote:
> On 27/04/2017 7:20, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> There is a pattern here:
>
> Yes: you continue to make irrational ad-hominem attacks against everyone
> who even slightly disagrees with you.  It's your peculiar psychosis.
>
>
>> 2.) The Israelis claim to be the "Chosen People of God,"  which implies that all other people are despised by God --- I find this offensive.
>
> No, Israelis don't make that claim.  So you're taking offense
> unnecessarily; not that that will stop you.
>
> Point of information: nobody gives a rat's ass what you find offensive,
> in particular since you delight in being offensive to others.
>
>
>> Both ANS-Forth and Judaism are cults --- in both cases they claim to be the standard for the entire world, and say that everybody else is a non-standard wanna-bee --- in both cases they quickly descend into flinging gross insults ("fuckin' loony cunt") at anybody who doubts their supposed superiority.
>
> Not even close.
>
> In the case of "Israelis", you're conflating "Israeli" and "Jewish". Of
> course you are probably not aware, since you don't ever bother
> researching anything, that 20% of Israeli citizens are not Jewish at all
> (they're Christians and Moslems and Druze and some other religions
> you've never heard of).  Of the remaining 80%, the majority is not
> "religious". So "Israeli" != "Jewish".  That's just to begin with.
>
> In the specific case of "Judaism", you're also wrong.  But answering
> your paranoid delusions is pointless, so I encourage you to just look up
> (from actual Jewish sources) what "Judaism" believes regarding non-Jews.
> You may be surprised.
>
> Of course, all this is ridiculously off-topic for CLF.  As usual.

I think you must be abusing Hugh.  When I converse with him he simply 
says I am a terrible person and that I attack him so he tries to put me 
in my place.  But you seem to bring out the truly evil side of him. 
Have you been practicing?

-- 

Rick C

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58233 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

On 04/27/17 08:31, rickman wrote:

> I think you must be abusing Hugh.  When I converse with him he simply
> says I am a terrible person and that I attack him so he tries to put me
> in my place.  But you seem to bring out the truly evil side of him. Have
> you been practicing?

Not much practice needed, I'm afraid.  Hugh's got a hard-on for certain
topics.  FORTH, Inc. for one; Israel or Jews for another; homosexuality
for yet another.  He has a compulsive need to "come out on top" at all
times (I'll leave others to speculate on why that may be so).

So when someone disagrees with him in any way, he flings at them
whatever excreta his mind latches onto as being the most damaging to
that person.

In my case, his rabid hatred of Israelis and/or Jews is what boils over.
 In other's cases, his hatred of FORTH, Inc. is what compels him to
label (just about everyone active in this newsgroup) as a "toady of Ms.
Rather".  <shrug>

So while he does occasionally make interesting technical statements or
contributions, his rather egregious antisocial behavior makes him a
target for those of us who have listened to his incessant screeds over
the years.

I apologize to the sane population of CLF, but sometimes I have an
overpowering urge to kick him in the nards.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58234 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

On 4/27/2017 1:43 AM, Ron Aaron wrote:
> On 04/27/17 08:31, rickman wrote:
>
>> I think you must be abusing Hugh.  When I converse with him he simply
>> says I am a terrible person and that I attack him so he tries to put me
>> in my place.  But you seem to bring out the truly evil side of him. Have
>> you been practicing?
>
> Not much practice needed, I'm afraid.  Hugh's got a hard-on for certain
> topics.  FORTH, Inc. for one; Israel or Jews for another; homosexuality
> for yet another.  He has a compulsive need to "come out on top" at all
> times (I'll leave others to speculate on why that may be so).
>
> So when someone disagrees with him in any way, he flings at them
> whatever excreta his mind latches onto as being the most damaging to
> that person.
>
> In my case, his rabid hatred of Israelis and/or Jews is what boils over.
>  In other's cases, his hatred of FORTH, Inc. is what compels him to
> label (just about everyone active in this newsgroup) as a "toady of Ms.
> Rather".  <shrug>
>
> So while he does occasionally make interesting technical statements or
> contributions, his rather egregious antisocial behavior makes him a
> target for those of us who have listened to his incessant screeds over
> the years.
>
> I apologize to the sane population of CLF, but sometimes I have an
> overpowering urge to kick him in the nards.

Yeah, I know what you mean.  I don't especially enjoy abusing the 
mentally ill, but often he gives an appearance of not being so mentally 
ill and I respond.  I guess I should just resist and ignore him as I 
encourage others to do.  Easier to say than do, I guess...

There are times I regret his insanity.  I wouldn't mind discussing his 
Forth CPU ideas, but likely they are a bit grandiose for efficient 
implementation.  He thinks in software terms which often will result in 
poor hardware.  It can be hard to come up with an approach which works 
well for both hardware and software.

-- 

Rick C

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58285 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 10:43:41 PM UTC-7, Ron Aaron wrote:
> I apologize to the sane population of CLF, but sometimes I have an
> overpowering urge to kick him in the nards.

Please get some psychiatric help before you hurt someone.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58286 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

On 4/27/2017 4:17 PM, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 10:43:41 PM UTC-7, Ron Aaron wrote:
>> I apologize to the sane population of CLF, but sometimes I have an
>> overpowering urge to kick him in the nards.
>
> Please get some psychiatric help before you hurt someone.

Physician heal thyself!

-- 

Rick C

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58292 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

On 27/04/2017 23:17, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 10:43:41 PM UTC-7, Ron Aaron wrote:
>> I apologize to the sane population of CLF, but sometimes I have an
>> overpowering urge to kick him in the nards.
> 
> Please get some psychiatric help before you hurt someone.

Thanks!

I never thought you would exhibit a sense of humor.  Live and learn!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58295 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

Just a followup to a previous statement I made: I was wrong.

The Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics just released a demographics
report (as they do every year, prior to Israel Independence Day).

As of this latest report, the non-Jewish population is about 25%, not
20% as I had said.

Among the Jewish population, only 44% identify as "secular or
non-religious", which surprises me -- it's always been more than 50%
(and in the past, considerably more).

Among the non-Jewish population, a mere 21% identify as
secular/non-religious.

Still off-topic for the group, though...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58371 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

Ron Aaron wrote:
> Just a followup to a previous statement I made: I was wrong.
>
> The Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics just released a demographics
> report (as they do every year, prior to Israel Independence Day).
>
> As of this latest report, the non-Jewish population is about 25%, not
> 20% as I had said.
>
> Among the Jewish population, only 44% identify as "secular or
> non-religious", which surprises me -- it's always been more than 50%
> (and in the past, considerably more).

I'd say what's being reported is the willingness or otherwise of citizens to
publicly express a position, and that's going to be influenced by external
factors.  A 'secular or non-religious' doesn't suddenly 'get religion'.

> ...
> Still off-topic for the group, though...

Easily remedied e.g. 'What attracted you to Forth - circumstance or disposition?' :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58376 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

On Saturday, April 29, 2017 at 6:10:10 PM UTC-7, HAA wrote:
> Ron Aaron wrote:
> > Just a followup to a previous statement I made: I was wrong.
> >
> > The Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics just released a demographics
> > report (as they do every year, prior to Israel Independence Day).
> >
> > As of this latest report, the non-Jewish population is about 25%, not
> > 20% as I had said.

This is why the Israeli government routinely kills the non-Jewish population with anti-personnel weapons (including the white-phosphorous I mentioned earlier) --- the purpose is to keep the non-Jewish population down so they can never swing an election --- faking up a democracy only works well when one tribe controls 80% or more of the population --- it also only works well when that tribe gets billions of dollars in foreign-aid, plus weapons worth many billions more, plus gets a blind eye turned toward them when they break the Geneva Convention routinely.

> > Among the Jewish population, only 44% identify as "secular or
> > non-religious", which surprises me -- it's always been more than 50%
> > (and in the past, considerably more).
> 
> I'd say what's being reported is the willingness or otherwise of citizens to
> publicly express a position, and that's going to be influenced by external
> factors.  A 'secular or non-religious' doesn't suddenly 'get religion'.

Immigrants have to prove that they are Jewish by learning Hebrew, or they aren't allowed into Israel. Then the citizens who have been there all their lives, especially those whose parents were also natives, complain that the immigrants are just faking it to get the foreign-aid money and free land. There is a lot of strife among the Israelis to prove that they are Jewish enough to deserve the foreign-aid money and free land.

Any Israeli who doesn't claim to be enthusiastically Jewish is skating on thin ice. When it comes time to dole out the foreign-aid money and free land, the secular Israelis are going to find themselves at the bottom of the list, with the more enthusiastically Jewish Israelis above them on the list. The worst-case scenario for the secular Israeli would be getting kicked out of the country. Foreign-aid money is unlimited, but land does have limits --- not every Israeli can get free land and a free house --- some will be denied, and they will be the secular ones.

Ron Aaron is a fool! He makes blatantly secular statements on a public forum:

On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 9:45:06 PM UTC-7, Ron Aaron wrote:
> On 27/04/2017 7:20, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:
> > The Israelis claim to be the "Chosen People of God,"  which implies that all other people are despised by God --- I find this offensive.
> 
> No, Israelis don't make that claim.  So you're taking offense
> unnecessarily; not that that will stop you.

WTF??? Making that claim is the fundamental principle of Israel --- this is why Israel gets billions upon billions of dollars in foreign-aid money, unlimited weaponry, and free land --- because they have buffaloed idiot American Christians who focus too much on the Old Testament and have acquired an inferiority complex as a result (Bible-thumpers are known for being dumb, and Old Testament enthusiasts are dumber than dumb).

When it comes time to dole out the foreign-aid money and free land, is Ron Aaron going to be at the top of the list? No! That dumb-ass just bought himself a ticket to the bottom of the list. Ron Aaron should have at least made a half-ass effort at faking some Jewishness --- the smart thing to do is promote Israel as the "Chosen People of God" when he is on public forums --- he can admit that Chosenness is all horseshit in private among his fellow atheists, but not in public if he has any brains at all under his beanie cap.

Ron Aaron is also a fool because he says to me:
"Please get some psychiatric help before you hurt someone."
This is despite the fact that I have never threatened anybody on comp.lang.forth or any other internet forum.
Then he says this:
"I apologize to the sane population of CLF, but sometimes I have an overpowering urge to kick [Hugh] in the nards."
This is not the first time that he has made threats of physical violence on comp.lang.forth either. 
Ron Aaron is making a complete fool out of himself --- he is obviously mentally ill, or stupid, or both.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58377 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

On 04/30/17 07:52, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:

> This is why the Israeli government routinely kills the non-Jewish population with anti-personnel weapons (including the white-phosphorous I mentioned earlier) --- the purpose is to keep the non-Jewish population down so they can never swing an election --- faking up a democracy only works well when one tribe controls 80% or more of the population --- it also only works well when that tribe gets billions of dollars in foreign-aid, plus weapons worth many billions more, plus gets a blind eye turned toward them when they break the Geneva Convention routinely.

Hugh, Hugh!  You make my task far too easy.  Wait... I have to check on
my store of white-phosphorous, I think I'm running low. (cue Hugh
calling me out for my "disgusting insensitivity", blah, blah blah)

> Immigrants have to prove that they are Jewish by learning Hebrew, or they aren't allowed into Israel

So... are all the Arab Israelis who know Hebrew also Jewish?  Are the
Jewish Israelis who know Arabic, Muslims? I'm confused now.  Perhaps you
can elucidate.  For anyone with a shred of interest in the facts:
knowledge of Hebrew is neither a requirement for entering Israel, nor
for gaining citizenship.  I know quite a few people who are citizens,
and can't speak Hebrew.  Including some who were born here.

> Any Israeli who doesn't claim to be enthusiastically Jewish is skating on thin ice.

I didn't know there were so many ice-rinks in Tel-Aviv!  Really, please
do share more of your deep knowledge of Israel!

>...  not every Israeli can get free land and a free house --- some will be denied, and they will be the secular ones.

Wait, what?  The damned bank claims I owe them a lot of money on my
"mortgage".  WTF?  I'm supposed to have a free house and free land!?!?
Thanks for letting me know, Hugh!
Again, for anyone who is interested: nobody gets a "free house".  The
government actually owns all the land, and "homeowners" get a 99-year
lease of the land when they purchase a house (or farm or whatever).

And BTW, I'm not one of "the secular ones", but whatevs...

> Ron Aaron is a fool! He makes blatantly secular statements on a public forum:

Yes!  The "shabak" is going to haul me in for reprogramming, any day
now.  My main foolishness (on this forum, anyway), is in continuing to
barb you.  I should let the rabid dog lay (and lie, as you simply cannot
avoid doing).  But. I. Just. Can't. Control. Myself.

> WTF??? Making that claim is the fundamental principle of Israel

No, it isn't.

> When it comes time to dole out the foreign-aid money and free land, is Ron Aaron going to be at the top of the list? No! That dumb-ass just bought himself a ticket to the bottom of the list. Ron Aaron should have at least made a half-ass effort at faking some Jewishness --- the smart thing to do is promote Israel as the "Chosen People of God" when he is on public forums --- he can admit that Chosenness is all horseshit in private among his fellow atheists, but not in public if he has any brains at all under his beanie cap.

Damn!  Now you tell me!

What is this "free land" of which you speak?  Can you please point me at
the appropriate governmental agency to which I need apply?  My bank
account is awfully meager, I could really use the help.  Thanks!

> Ron Aaron is also a fool because he says to me:
> "Please get some psychiatric help before you hurt someone."
> This is despite the fact that I have never threatened anybody on comp.lang.forth or any other internet forum.

You've bragged in public fora about carrying a concealed and unlicensed
weapon.  Interested parties can look that up.  Your unstable mental
condition is obvious to anyone who reads your writing.  QED.

> Then he says this:
> "I apologize to the sane population of CLF, but sometimes I have an overpowering urge to kick [Hugh] in the nards."
> This is not the first time that he has made threats of physical violence on comp.lang.forth either. 
> Ron Aaron is making a complete fool out of himself --- he is obviously mentally ill, or stupid, or both.

Quite likely.

What's the weather like in Hugh's Fantasyland?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58379 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

On 4/30/2017 1:24 AM, Ron Aaron wrote:
>
> What's the weather like in Hugh's Fantasyland?

Can I ask your purpose in discussing this with Hugh?  This is one of his 
hot button issues and I don't see how you can have any impact on the way 
he thinks.  Is that what you are expecting?  Or are you just so shocked 
that anyone could be so dilusional?

-- 

Rick C

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58380 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

On 04/30/17 08:54, rickman wrote:
> On 4/30/2017 1:24 AM, Ron Aaron wrote:
>>
>> What's the weather like in Hugh's Fantasyland?
> 
> Can I ask your purpose in discussing this with Hugh?  This is one of his
> hot button issues and I don't see how you can have any impact on the way
> he thinks.  Is that what you are expecting?  Or are you just so shocked
> that anyone could be so dilusional?

I'm old enough that I'm no longer shocked by any delusional thing anyone
may happen to say.

I mainly respond to Hugh because I enjoy poking him while I'm bored
between compiles.  He always rises to the bait, always says the same
stupid shit.  It shows off a less than pleasant side of my personality.
Perhaps I do need some therapy after all...

The problem is that there are people who appear to take him seriously
(newbies, usually).  So I do feel that there is some value in showing
how far off the planet he is.  His lunacy is not confined to his
monomania regarding FORTH, Inc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58381 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

On 4/30/2017 2:04 AM, Ron Aaron wrote:
>
>
> On 04/30/17 08:54, rickman wrote:
>> On 4/30/2017 1:24 AM, Ron Aaron wrote:
>>>
>>> What's the weather like in Hugh's Fantasyland?
>>
>> Can I ask your purpose in discussing this with Hugh?  This is one of his
>> hot button issues and I don't see how you can have any impact on the way
>> he thinks.  Is that what you are expecting?  Or are you just so shocked
>> that anyone could be so dilusional?
>
> I'm old enough that I'm no longer shocked by any delusional thing anyone
> may happen to say.
>
> I mainly respond to Hugh because I enjoy poking him while I'm bored
> between compiles.  He always rises to the bait, always says the same
> stupid shit.  It shows off a less than pleasant side of my personality.
> Perhaps I do need some therapy after all...
>
> The problem is that there are people who appear to take him seriously
> (newbies, usually).  So I do feel that there is some value in showing
> how far off the planet he is.  His lunacy is not confined to his
> monomania regarding FORTH, Inc.

I have to acknowledge my prodding the bear sometimes.  I really just 
can't resist and I'm not sure why.  Responding to him is of no value and 
I don't think there is even a chance of altering his behavior in any 
meaningful way.  He is just so nuts that sometimes I feel compelled to 
not ignore it.  I will try harder in the future.  It does nothing for 
this group and I don't think there are any novices that can't see Hugh 
for what he is.  At least not once they read his attacks on the world.

-- 

Rick C

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58382 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

Everybody knows that the world would be different without the Jews and the women.
But so far no one has proved that any of these groups is responible for the 
Dropbox debacle. 

The most and the worst problems in this world are caused by non Jewish men.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58383 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

On 04/30/17 10:41, lehs wrote:
> Everybody knows that the world would be different without the Jews and the women.
> But so far no one has proved that any of these groups is responible for the 
> Dropbox debacle. 
> 
> The most and the worst problems in this world are caused by non Jewish men.


Keep stirring the pot...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#58384 — Re: OT: Hugh's in need of help (was Re: Dropbox rant)

Den söndag 30 april 2017 kl. 10:01:44 UTC+2 skrev Ron Aaron:
> On 04/30/17 10:41, lehs wrote:
> > Everybody knows that the world would be different without the Jews and the women.
> > But so far no one has proved that any of these groups is responible for the 
> > Dropbox debacle. 
> > 
> > The most and the worst problems in this world are caused by non Jewish men.
> 
> 
> Keep stirring the pot...

What pot? The drop pot?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.forth

csiph-web