Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #55129 > unrolled thread

eForth specific words?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.forth

Contents

  eForth specific words? Michael Barry <barrym95838@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-26 14:20 -0800
    Re: eForth specific words? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-02-26 17:57 -0800
      Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-02-26 23:15 -0600
      Re: eForth specific words? Michael Barry <barrym95838@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-26 22:04 -0800
        Re: eForth specific words? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-02-27 02:49 -0800
          Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-02-27 11:15 -0600
            Re: eForth specific words? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-02-27 13:10 -0800
              Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-02-27 16:51 -0600
              Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-02-28 22:47 -0600
                Re: eForth specific words? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-28 21:15 -0800
                  Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 01:08 -0500
                    Re: eForth specific words? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-28 23:21 -0800
                  Re: eForth specific words? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-03-01 03:22 -0800
                    Re: eForth specific words? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-01 13:45 -0800
                      Re: eForth specific words? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-01 15:42 -0800
                        Re: eForth specific words? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2017-03-11 14:33 +0000
                        Re: eForth specific words? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-03-11 11:06 -0800
                          Re: eForth specific words? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2017-03-12 09:58 +0000
                            Re: eForth specific words? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-03-12 03:42 -0700
                      Re: eForth specific words? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-03-02 15:37 +1100
                        Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-02 00:40 -0500
                          Re: eForth specific words? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-01 21:57 -0800
                Re: eForth specific words? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-03-01 03:13 -0800
                  Re: eForth specific words? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 03:29 -0800
                    Re: eForth specific words? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-03-01 10:49 -0800
                      Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 14:13 -0500
                      Re: eForth specific words? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2017-03-11 12:39 +0000
                        Re: eForth specific words? pbro <peter040@sympatico.ca> - 2017-03-11 13:09 -0800
                          Re: eForth specific words? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2017-03-12 10:22 +0000
                            Re: eForth specific words? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-03-12 03:57 -0700
                              Re: eForth specific words? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2017-03-12 15:03 +0000
                  Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-01 09:42 -0600
                    Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-01 10:27 -0600
                      Re: eForth specific words? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-03-01 11:12 -0800
                        Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 14:19 -0500
                        Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-01 14:34 -0600
                      Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 14:16 -0500
                  Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 14:08 -0500
                    Re: eForth specific words? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-03-01 11:22 -0800
                      Re: eForth specific words? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-01 11:29 -0800
                        Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-01 14:54 -0600
                      Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 18:00 -0500
                Re: eForth specific words? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2017-03-01 13:33 +0100
                  Re: eForth specific words? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 06:19 -0800
                    Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 14:17 -0500
                  Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-03-01 09:54 -0600
          Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-27 14:21 -0500
        Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-02-27 11:08 -0600
          Re: eForth specific words? Michael Barry <barrym95838@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-27 09:17 -0800
            Re: eForth specific words? Michael Barry <barrym95838@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-27 09:38 -0800
            Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-02-27 12:34 -0600
              Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-27 14:23 -0500
                Re: eForth specific words? Michael Barry <barrym95838@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-27 11:49 -0800
                  Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-27 15:14 -0500
                    Re: eForth specific words? Michael Barry <barrym95838@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-27 12:39 -0800
                      Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-02-27 15:04 -0600
                        Re: eForth specific words? Michael Barry <barrym95838@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-27 14:31 -0800
                      Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-27 17:44 -0500
          Re: eForth specific words? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-27 23:11 -0800
            Re: eForth specific words? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-02-27 23:22 -0800
              Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-02-28 01:26 -0600
                Re: eForth specific words? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-02-28 00:58 -0800
                  Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-02-28 10:24 -0600
            Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-02-28 01:25 -0600
              Re: eForth specific words? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-28 03:44 -0800
                Re: eForth specific words? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-02-28 09:56 -0800
                  Re: eForth specific words? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-28 14:16 -0800
                    Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 20:03 -0500
                Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-02-28 12:12 -0600
                  Re: eForth specific words? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-28 14:19 -0800
                    Re: eForth specific words? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-02-28 16:49 -0600
                      Re: eForth specific words? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-28 15:07 -0800
        Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-27 14:19 -0500
    Re: eForth specific words? David Schultz <abuse@127.0.0.1> - 2017-02-26 20:15 -0600
      Re: eForth specific words? Michael Barry <barrym95838@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-26 20:15 -0800
    Re: eForth specific words? Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2017-02-26 18:20 -0800
      Re: eForth specific words? David Schultz <abuse@127.0.0.1> - 2017-02-26 20:33 -0600
        Re: eForth specific words? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-26 22:18 -0500
    Re: eForth specific words? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2017-02-27 03:19 -0800
      Re: eForth specific words? Michael Barry <barrym95838@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-27 08:08 -0800
    Re: eForth specific words? "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-02-28 19:30 +1100
    Re: eForth specific words? jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 11:43 -0800
      Re: eForth specific words? jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 12:16 -0800

Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5  Next page →

#55329

On 3/1/2017 1:29 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
> JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> writes:
>> If cracking DRM , showing how to do it, and then using my eBooks to
>> demonstrate how to do it , i do dare to comment.
>
> Cecil didn't tell anyone how to crack DRM.  He said it could be cracked,
> which we all already knew anyway.  He didn't say how to do it.
>
Folks this conversation would work it reason was used instead of 
emotions, so there is not a whole lot to be gained by pursuing it.

In a way it makes me sad, one more chip at humanity and reason. Oh well, 
on with my software project of the week, the speeding up eForth for the 
esp8266, or is that allowed? I think I can make it at least 5X faster 
most likely more, it's not very efficient as written but it works.

I can see why Forth compilers written in C are slow, but at least it 
makes it more portable, I have a printout of the esp8266 Programmers 
Manual (assembler) and it will take a while to absorb it.

As an aside does anyone know if there are any tools that show the 
generated code from the Arduino Platform, right now I'm blind as to what 
it's generating so I can figure out more efficient way to generate an 
eForth VM.  I suppose one way is to download their development tools and 
modify the source code so it compiles, their tools show the generated 
code. Another method is to have a loop that is timed and executes a 
small fragment of code thousands of time and compare it to other ways, 
but that is very inefficient way of finding a more efficient way to code.

Computers are evil.

-- 
Cecil - k5nwa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55337

On 3/1/2017 2:22 PM, JUERGEN wrote:
> you have joined the Forth Killer league

THAT is what I was replying to.  You are far over reacting.  You seem to 
think that talking about the fact that DRM can be circumvented is the 
same as promoting it.  It's NOT.  You really need to take another look 
at this.  No one did anything wrong, but you are telling people they are 
wrong and worse.

-- 

Rick C

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55298

In article <o95jl9$f7i$1@dont-email.me>,
Cecil Bayona  <cbayona@cbayona.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
>
>Makes one not want to be an author because it's so easy to steal ones
>hard work.

That is not true. Illegal commercial exploitation of works ( i.e. without
proper copyright clearance, don't call that stealing, that is
a misleading term) commands all but the dead penalty in the US.
Don't call that easy.

It is unpleasant that on top of the draconian legal protection,
legitime users are harassed.
I'm willing to pay for eBooks and won't distribute them illegally,
but I won't deal with Kindle.

>Cecil - k5nwa
-- 
Albert van der Horst, UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS
Economic growth -- being exponential -- ultimately falters.
albert@spe&ar&c.xs4all.nl &=n http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55301

On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 12:33:18 UTC, Albert van der Horst  wrote:
> In article <o95jl9$f7i$1@dont-email.me>,
> Cecil Bayona  <cbayona@cbayona.com> wrote:
> <SNIP>
> >
> >Makes one not want to be an author because it's so easy to steal ones
> >hard work.
> 
> That is not true. Illegal commercial exploitation of works ( i.e. without
> proper copyright clearance, don't call that stealing, that is
> a misleading term) commands all but the dead penalty in the US.
> Don't call that easy.
> 
> It is unpleasant that on top of the draconian legal protection,
> legitime users are harassed.
> I'm willing to pay for eBooks and won't distribute them illegally,
> but I won't deal with Kindle.
> 
> >Cecil - k5nwa
> -- 
> Albert van der Horst, UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS
> Economic growth -- being exponential -- ultimately falters.
> albert@spe&ar&c.xs4all.nl &=n http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst

In what way do you think you're harassed with DRM on Kindle?

1) You buy the book on the Amazon website
2) About 10 seconds later it appears on your kindle
3) Read and enjoy.

If you have multiple readers/kindles, you can select which device
you want to read it on. Up to 5 devices. You can also share books
in your library with family members. Just a like a "real" book.

The only thing you can't do is make illegal copies for your friends.

Just like a real book.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55317

On 3/1/2017 9:19 AM, Mark Wills wrote:
> On Wednesday, 1 March 2017 12:33:18 UTC, Albert van der Horst  wrote:
>> In article <o95jl9$f7i$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Cecil Bayona  <cbayona@cbayona.com> wrote:
>> <SNIP>
>>>
>>> Makes one not want to be an author because it's so easy to steal ones
>>> hard work.
>>
>> That is not true. Illegal commercial exploitation of works ( i.e. without
>> proper copyright clearance, don't call that stealing, that is
>> a misleading term) commands all but the dead penalty in the US.
>> Don't call that easy.
>>
>> It is unpleasant that on top of the draconian legal protection,
>> legitime users are harassed.
>> I'm willing to pay for eBooks and won't distribute them illegally,
>> but I won't deal with Kindle.
>>
>>> Cecil - k5nwa
>> --
>> Albert van der Horst, UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS
>> Economic growth -- being exponential -- ultimately falters.
>> albert@spe&ar&c.xs4all.nl &=n http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst
>
> In what way do you think you're harassed with DRM on Kindle?
>
> 1) You buy the book on the Amazon website
> 2) About 10 seconds later it appears on your kindle
> 3) Read and enjoy.
>
> If you have multiple readers/kindles, you can select which device
> you want to read it on. Up to 5 devices. You can also share books
> in your library with family members. Just a like a "real" book.
>
> The only thing you can't do is make illegal copies for your friends.
>
> Just like a real book.

I can lend a book to anyone I wish, they don't have to share DNA with me.

-- 

Rick C

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55303

On 3/1/2017 6:33 AM, Albert van der Horst wrote:
> In article <o95jl9$f7i$1@dont-email.me>,
> Cecil Bayona  <cbayona@cbayona.com> wrote:
> <SNIP>
>>
>> Makes one not want to be an author because it's so easy to steal ones
>> hard work.
>
> That is not true. Illegal commercial exploitation of works ( i.e. without
> proper copyright clearance, don't call that stealing, that is
> a misleading term) commands all but the dead penalty in the US.
> Don't call that easy.
>
> It is unpleasant that on top of the draconian legal protection,
> legitime users are harassed.
> I'm willing to pay for eBooks and won't distribute them illegally,
> but I won't deal with Kindle.
>
>> Cecil - k5nwa

OK, I'm simple, if you take something without permission that you are 
suppose to pay for but don't, I call that stealing. It doesn't matter if 
the people at Amazon are jerks or not, it's somebody else's work and one 
needs to pay for it.

In the States DRM has gone way off the rails with the Digital Millenium 
Act, they totally bypass all the Fair Use Laws, and it pisses me quite 
often, I have several Blue Ray movies I paid good money for and they 
won't play on certain computers because DRM says the video card will not 
protect the content. Excuse me, I plaid for that movie and I should be 
able to play it on whatever computer I want. My answer was to buy Video 
Player software that plays the movie no matter what the video card is, 
problem solved.

-- 
Cecil - k5nwa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55198

On 2/27/2017 5:49 AM, JUERGEN wrote:
> On Monday, February 27, 2017 at 6:04:34 AM UTC, Michael Barry wrote:
>> On Sunday, February 26, 2017 at 5:57:53 PM UTC-8, hughag...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I gave up on eForth due to the lack of documentation. AFAIK, it is a good
>>> Forth system, but I don't have time to figure this stuff out through
>>> experimentation.
>>>
>>> Good luck! If you obtain any documentation, send it to me in private
>>> email. All I have is what I downloaded from the offete website, but it
>>> doesn't really tell me anything --- there is no reference document
>>> describing what all the words do.
>>
>> https://filescdn.com/af4f2d7tc76z/jsgsa.Zen.and.the.Forth.Language.EFORTH.for.the.MSP430.from.Texas.Instruments.pdf
>>
>> I know that Ray Duncan didn't have a very high opinion of Dr. Ting's
>>  literature, but I find him to be entertaining and charming, in an
>>  eccentric sort of way.  Although it is probably politically incorrect
>>  to say so, I found it helpful to read along in my head with a Chinese
>>  accent. :-)
>>
>> Mike B.
>
> Michael Barry, I have just reported you to Kindle / amazon for copyright violation. And will let them do their work.
> You ripped my eBook and are republishing it for free.
> Even if you have not done this yourself you are still violating copyright as you know it very well and you are still distributing it.
>
> Copyright is quite clearly stated in the first lines of what you published here in full knowledge of what you are distributing.
>
> And I assume that Ting is not very happy about it either.
>
> https://filescdn.com/af4f2d7tc76z/jsgsa.Zen.and.the.Forth.Language.EFORTH.for.the.MSP430.from.Texas.Instruments.pdf
>
> I might consider seperate legal steps.

And now you are reposting the link that tries to infect your computer.

-- 

Rick C

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55186

On 2/27/2017 12:04 AM, Michael Barry wrote:
> On Sunday, February 26, 2017 at 5:57:53 PM UTC-8, hughag...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I gave up on eForth due to the lack of documentation. AFAIK, it is a good
>> Forth system, but I don't have time to figure this stuff out through
>> experimentation.
>>
>> Good luck! If you obtain any documentation, send it to me in private
>> email. All I have is what I downloaded from the offete website, but it
>> doesn't really tell me anything --- there is no reference document
>> describing what all the words do.
>
> https://filescdn.com/af4f2d7tc76z/jsgsa.Zen.and.the.Forth.Language.EFORTH.for.the.MSP430.from.Texas.Instruments.pdf
>
> I know that Ray Duncan didn't have a very high opinion of Dr. Ting's
>  literature, but I find him to be entertaining and charming, in an
>  eccentric sort of way.  Although it is probably politically incorrect
>  to say so, I found it helpful to read along in my head with a Chinese
>  accent. :-)
>
> Mike B.
>

Interesting site, to download a pdf file you have to install some 
software from them (who are they?), no explanation of why, they rig up 
your browser so one cannot leave their page without resorting to the 
program manager.

This smells to high heaven, thanks but no thanks, I would find another 
site to put that PDF file in that is less suspicious.


-- 
Cecil - k5nwa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55188

Cecil, didn't you read Juergen's accusation?  That PDF doesn't belong
 anywhere except in the trash, because it's an illegal copy.  When I
 get home, it's getting deleted from my hard drive too, and I'm never
 going back to that site or telling anyone about it.

Mike B.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55190

... and Juergen has made it abundantly clear that the link is
 illegal, so please stop quoting it.  I had absolutely nothing
 to do with that upload.  I just found it a few pages down in
 my search engine, and innocently followed it without paying
 attention to its legality, or lack thereof.  I send my heart-
 felt apologies to anyone and everyone who was hurt or offended
 by it, including Juergen and Dr. Ting.

Mike B.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55193

On 2/27/2017 11:17 AM, Michael Barry wrote:
> Cecil, didn't you read Juergen's accusation?  That PDF doesn't belong
>  anywhere except in the trash, because it's an illegal copy.  When I
>  get home, it's getting deleted from my hard drive too, and I'm never
>  going back to that site or telling anyone about it.
>
> Mike B.
>
That message was after your link was posted and before I received his 
post. The site itself is a questionable site, I wonder how many persons 
installed that sites software and what will be the consequences.

Did you and others not wonder why you had to install software before 
downloading a pdf file? The Internet is a very unsafe place for the 
person that does not question things.

-- 
Cecil - k5nwa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55199

On 2/27/2017 1:34 PM, Cecil Bayona wrote:
> On 2/27/2017 11:17 AM, Michael Barry wrote:
>> Cecil, didn't you read Juergen's accusation?  That PDF doesn't belong
>>  anywhere except in the trash, because it's an illegal copy.  When I
>>  get home, it's getting deleted from my hard drive too, and I'm never
>>  going back to that site or telling anyone about it.
>>
>> Mike B.
>>
> That message was after your link was posted and before I received his
> post. The site itself is a questionable site, I wonder how many persons
> installed that sites software and what will be the consequences.
>
> Did you and others not wonder why you had to install software before
> downloading a pdf file? The Internet is a very unsafe place for the
> person that does not question things.

You never need to install software to download or view PDFs.  They are 
trying to infect you with a virus and I don't know why Michael Barry and 
JUERGEN are posting it.

-- 

Rick C

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55200

On Monday, February 27, 2017 at 11:23:35 AM UTC-8, rickman wrote:
> ...

Rick, I am going to ask the same of you ... please stop quoting that
 link!  I don't remember having any obvious virus issues from going
 there, but it has turned into a nightmare, and I just want it to
 end.  Are you actually trying to be a dick by doing the exact thing
 that you're accusing others of doing?

Mike B.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55202

On 2/27/2017 2:49 PM, Michael Barry wrote:
> On Monday, February 27, 2017 at 11:23:35 AM UTC-8, rickman wrote:
>> ...
>
> Rick, I am going to ask the same of you ... please stop quoting that
>  link!  I don't remember having any obvious virus issues from going
>  there, but it has turned into a nightmare, and I just want it to
>  end.  Are you actually trying to be a dick by doing the exact thing
>  that you're accusing others of doing?

The message you replied to does not include a link of any kind.

-- 

Rick C

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55205

On Monday, February 27, 2017 at 12:14:15 PM UTC-8, rickman wrote:
> 
> The message you replied to does not include a link of any kind.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Rick C

No shit, Sherlock!  Are you claiming that you didn't intentionally
 quote that link in at least two other posts in this thread?

Mike B.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55207

On 2/27/2017 2:39 PM, Michael Barry wrote:
> On Monday, February 27, 2017 at 12:14:15 PM UTC-8, rickman wrote:
>>
>> The message you replied to does not include a link of any kind.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Rick C
>
> No shit, Sherlock!  Are you claiming that you didn't intentionally
>  quote that link in at least two other posts in this thread?
>
> Mike B.
>
Barry you started this so quit being so self righteous like it's 
everyone else's fault, drop the subject and it will go away.

-- 
Cecil - k5nwa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55212

On Monday, February 27, 2017 at 1:04:41 PM UTC-8, Cecil - k5nwa wrote:
> ...
> Barry you started this so quit being so self righteous like it's 
> everyone else's fault, drop the subject and it will go away.
> 
> -- 
> Cecil - k5nwa

Acknowledged.  Thank you for your sensible advice.  I will follow it.

Mike B.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55215

On 2/27/2017 3:39 PM, Michael Barry wrote:
> On Monday, February 27, 2017 at 12:14:15 PM UTC-8, rickman wrote:
>>
>> The message you replied to does not include a link of any kind.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Rick C
>
> No shit, Sherlock!  Are you claiming that you didn't intentionally
>  quote that link in at least two other posts in this thread?

I don't know what you are going on about.  How does it matter how many 
times the link is posted?  Usenet is forever.  Those links are now 
archived for all time and there is nothing you can do about it.

You can however, continue to rant and rave.

-- 

Rick C

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55233

Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> writes:
> This smells to high heaven, thanks but no thanks, I would find another
> site to put that PDF file in that is less suspicious.

Lots of us here can supply hosting space, but we'd need Ting's
permission and it doesn't sound like he's up for that.

I think this Kindle thing is unfortunate.  I'd like to read some of the
books, I don't mind paying money for them, but I don't use a Kindle and
don't want to use one.  I'd much rather get a plain pdf or epub.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#55236

On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 7:11:43 AM UTC, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> writes:
> > This smells to high heaven, thanks but no thanks, I would find another
> > site to put that PDF file in that is less suspicious.
> 
> Lots of us here can supply hosting space, but we'd need Ting's
> permission and it doesn't sound like he's up for that.
> 
> I think this Kindle thing is unfortunate.  I'd like to read some of the
> books, I don't mind paying money for them, but I don't use a Kindle and
> don't want to use one.  I'd much rather get a plain pdf or epub.

Just download the free reader for any screen you have including PC AS I STARTED before I bought a tablet to see what the eBooks would look like on a real tablet. If you buy one of the eBooks on the Forth Bookshelf YOU can read it on ALL 3 DEVICES at the same time for the price of one ...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.forth

csiph-web