Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #53082 > unrolled thread

kernel word frequency

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.forth

Contents

  kernel word frequency john <anon@example.com> - 2016-12-05 14:01 +0000
    Re: kernel word frequency hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-12-05 07:44 -0800
      Re: kernel word frequency john <anon@example.com> - 2016-12-05 16:09 +0000
    Re: kernel word frequency Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2016-12-05 16:01 -0500
      Re: kernel word frequency john <anon@example.com> - 2016-12-06 12:44 +0000
        Re: kernel word frequency Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2016-12-06 13:36 -0500
          Re: kernel word frequency john <anon@example.com> - 2016-12-06 23:26 +0000
    Re: kernel word frequency hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-12-06 10:58 -0800

#53082 — kernel word frequency

has anyone done any exaluation of kernel word frequency 
or other kernel specific  evaluations?

TIA

-- 
john

=========================
http://johntech.co.uk

"Bleeding Edge Forum"
http://johntech.co.uk/forum/ 

=========================

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#53084

On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 7:04:04 AM UTC-7, john wrote:
> has anyone done any exaluation of kernel word frequency 
> or other kernel specific  evaluations?

That has been done to death. 

My Stundurd processor design was based on which kernel words were considered to be the most frequent (hopefully in the most speed-critical parts of the programs) --- these became primitives --- everything else has to be written as colon functions in terms of these.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#53086

In article <311c4d68-5d7e-4636-8b61-418e02393029@googlegroups.com>, 
hughaguilar96@gmail.com says...
> 
> On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 7:04:04 AM UTC-7, john wrote:
> > has anyone done any exaluation of kernel word frequency 
> > or other kernel specific  evaluations?
> 
> That has been done to death. 
>
I'm sure it has 
 
> My Stundurd processor design was based on which kernel words were considered to be the most frequent (hopefully in the most speed-critical parts of the programs) --- these became primitives --- everything else has to be written as colon functions in terms of these.

The implied question  was does anyone have any links for the data.
Sorry if I confused you.


-- 

john

=========================
http://johntech.co.uk

"Bleeding Edge Forum"
http://johntech.co.uk/forum/ 

=========================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#53097

On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 14:01:42 -0000
john <anon@example.com> wrote:

> has anyone done any exaluation of kernel word frequency 
> or other kernel specific  evaluations?
> 

https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/stack_computers/sec6_3.html
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/peep/
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/papers/gregg+01euroforth.ps.gz

Have you seen those?


Rod Pemberton

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#53128

In article <20161205160110.61143dde@_>, 
NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem says...
> 
> On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 14:01:42 -0000
> john <anon@example.com> wrote:
> 
> > has anyone done any exaluation of kernel word frequency 
> > or other kernel specific  evaluations?
> > 
> 
> https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/stack_computers/sec6_3.html
> http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/peep/
> http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/papers/gregg+01euroforth.ps.gz
> 
> Have you seen those?
> 
> 
> Rod Pemberton

Thanks Rod - I only had one of those. 
I'm always open to more data if anyone has more.

-- 

john

=========================
http://johntech.co.uk

"Bleeding Edge Forum"
http://johntech.co.uk/forum/ 

=========================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#53136

On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:44:03 -0000
john <anon@example.com> wrote:

> In article <20161205160110.61143dde@_>, 
> NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem says...
> > On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 14:01:42 -0000
> > john <anon@example.com> wrote:

> > > has anyone done any exaluation of kernel word frequency 
> > > or other kernel specific  evaluations?
> > >   
> > 
> > https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/stack_computers/sec6_3.html
> > http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/peep/
> > http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/papers/gregg+01euroforth.ps.gz
> > 
> > Have you seen those?
> > 
>
> Thanks Rod - I only had one of those. 
> I'm always open to more data if anyone has more.
> 

I found one more Anton posted a link to in the c.l.f. archives:

http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/misc/stack-caching-data/

Anton Ertl's stack-caching-data files have execution frequencies much
like the peep data files.


Rod Pemberton

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#53144

> In article <20161206133609.0e294b6b@_>, NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem says...

> 
> I found one more Anton posted a link to in the c.l.f. archives:
> 
> http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/misc/stack-caching-data/
> 
> Anton Ertl's stack-caching-data files have execution frequencies much
> like the peep data files.
> 
> 
> Rod Pemberton

appreciated - cheers Rod.

-- 

john

=========================
http://johntech.co.uk

"Bleeding Edge Forum"
http://johntech.co.uk/forum/ 

=========================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#53137

On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 7:04:04 AM UTC-7, john wrote:
> has anyone done any exaluation of kernel word frequency 
> or other kernel specific  evaluations?

Do you mean the frequency with which they get executed, or the frequency with which they appear in the source-code?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.forth

csiph-web