Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #27981
| From | "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. |
| Date | 2014-01-20 16:34 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <op.w9z8vvfm5zc71u@localhost> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <baf16dab-2d99-4bdf-bbc9-dd3d775a749b@googlegroups.com> <52dc29b2$0$24920$e4fe514c@dreader36.news.xs4all.nl> <dbaf1242-1161-4c57-8d73-6ec92007c15d@googlegroups.com> <op.w9yhp4fb5zc71u@localhost> <78b7563a-6442-4908-b547-eb6ea6cd3c88@googlegroups.com> |
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:55:42 -0500, <mszepien@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, January 19, 2014 11:50:18 PM UTC+1, Rod Pemberton wrote: >> On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 16:40:07 -0500, <mszepien@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Well actually, as you alluded in your first post, it's not so much a >> > matter of speed as of energy consumption. >> >> Bitcoins are first come. I.e., whomever solves a "proof of work" >> problem first, gets the coins for it. So, I'd say speed is very >> important... > > I think that's actually not true, since the proof of work problem > involves brute-forcing a hash function and not some sequential > algorithm. I think speed of a single hash computation doesn't matter, as > long as it stays considerably shorter than the average block > confirmation time on the bitcoin network (calibrated to be 10 minutes). > > Suppose I have two machines at my disposal. The first consumes an energy > E1 to produce 10^6 hashes in time T1; the second takes energy E2 < E1 to > produce the same amount of hashes in time T2 > T1. > AIUI, you don't get to choose who your competition is. Multiple computers, or groups of them, attempt to solve the exact same proof-of-work at the same time. I.e., if this was a foot race, it's a sprint with many losers and one winner. If my machines are attempting to solve the same proof-of-work as your machines, and my machines solve it first, you don't get any bitcoins. I get the bitcoins. Once a proof-of-work has been solved, any computers that were attempting to solve that proof of work but failed stop working that proof and start another. Now, if your is working a different proof than my machine, you might have a chance at earning some coin. But, if my faster machine is competing against your slower machine, you lose again, and again, ... Does it matter to me how much energy I consume? Yes, but only once my machines are sufficiently faster than yours so I earn the bitcoin. If I'm not earning *any* bitcoin because my machines are too slow, it doesn't really matter whether I have an energy efficient machine or not. I'm not receiving any coinage. All my machines are a loss. So, AIUI, speed matters very much. Rod Pemberton
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-01-12 15:18 +0000
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. Tristan Plumb <firth@trstn.net> - 2014-01-12 17:02 +0000
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-01-12 17:27 +0000
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. Tristan Plumb <firth@trstn.net> - 2014-01-12 22:40 +0000
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-01-12 23:03 +0000
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-01-12 16:54 -0800
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-01-13 02:45 -0500
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-01-13 02:54 -0500
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-01-13 02:57 -0500
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-01-13 12:32 +0000
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-01-13 09:52 -0500
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. mszepien@gmail.com - 2014-01-19 11:01 -0800
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-01-19 19:38 +0000
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. mszepien@gmail.com - 2014-01-19 13:40 -0800
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-01-19 17:50 -0500
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. mszepien@gmail.com - 2014-01-20 12:55 -0800
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-01-20 16:34 -0500
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. mszepien@gmail.com - 2014-01-21 04:49 -0800
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-01-21 10:48 -0500
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. mszepien@gmail.com - 2014-01-21 14:37 -0800
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-01-22 19:30 +0000
Re: Green Array energy consumption: a reality check. "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnohavenotit.cnm> - 2014-01-27 16:26 -0500
csiph-web