Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #59409
| From | "Robert L." <No_spamming@noWhere_7073.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: anyone ever redo SICP but using forth? |
| Date | 2017-05-17 01:33 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <ofg98h$g3c$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <9bfefe5d-71f1-44b3-a2b2-6765c7360baa@googlegroups.com> |
On 5/16/2017, gavino himself wrote: > ? No. Duh. That would be like doing it using assembly language. That would be retarded. Forth is extremely low-level and primitive. Evidently, you know know nothing about Forth or Scheme or Lisp--- and you never will.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
anyone ever redo SICP but using forth? gavino himself <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 11:27 -0700
Re: anyone ever redo SICP but using forth? "Robert L." <No_spamming@noWhere_7073.org> - 2017-05-17 01:33 +0000
Re: anyone ever redo SICP but using forth? Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 21:07 -0700
Re: anyone ever redo SICP but using forth? gavino himself <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 09:46 -0700
Re: anyone ever redo SICP but using forth? gavino himself <jackvanc3@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 09:31 -0700
csiph-web