Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #52126

Re: The implementation of S, in GForth

From "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: The implementation of S, in GForth
Date 2016-10-23 16:44 +1000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <nuhipq$14va$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <06a5cb83-da91-4b38-a0ea-e38508ed8aee@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


lehs wrote:
> In GForth  S,  is implemented with an final align
>
> see s,
> : S,
>   here noop 1+ allot place align ; ok
>
> that seems unnecessary. Suppose you want to store several counted strings in the same
> array, then there would be an easy way to recall the i:th string in the array by
>
> : nextword \ ad -- ad'
>   dup c@ + 1+ ;
>
> : word# \ array i -- ad n
>   over @ mod 0
>   rot cell+ -rot
>   ?do nextword loop count ;
>
> if the strings would have been stored without trailing blanks.
> So why this ALIGN?

If it's any comfort VFX, SWF, Win32F all have their own variations on this.



Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The implementation of S, in GForth lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 06:55 -0700
  Re: The implementation of S, in GForth "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-10-23 16:44 +1000
  Re: The implementation of S, in GForth Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2016-10-23 05:08 -0400
    Re: The implementation of S, in GForth albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-10-23 18:03 +0200
  Re: The implementation of S, in GForth lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 02:10 -0700
    Re: The implementation of S, in GForth "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2016-10-25 21:39 +1000
      Re: The implementation of S, in GForth lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 05:59 -0700

csiph-web