Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #38739
| From | "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Less Is Moore |
| Date | 2015-05-01 13:39 +1000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <mhusgm$2he$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <f5ce5d72-b1eb-4847-be7b-10152363488a@googlegroups.com> |
Steve Graham wrote: > https://samgentle.com/posts/2015-04-26-less-is-moore > > The author posits that Forth is minimalistic because it originated in a > resource-constrained era and asks if it is still relevant? The subject line says it all. Moore believed in minimalism as a principle and Forth was the result. > What other strengths of Forth do you appreciate other than the ability to operate in > systems with relatively constrained resources? Insofar as minimalism encourages thoughtful programming, Forth will continue to have a place for those who care.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Less Is Moore Steve Graham <solitary.wanderer52@gmail.com> - 2015-04-27 13:10 -0700
Re: Less Is Moore "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2015-04-27 21:22 +0100
Re: Less Is Moore "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2015-04-27 13:29 -1000
Re: Less Is Moore Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2015-04-28 01:12 -0700
Re: Less Is Moore "Rod Pemberton" <bork@lllljunkqwer.cpm> - 2015-04-27 18:37 -0400
Re: Less Is Moore "Rod Pemberton" <bork@lllljunkqwer.cpm> - 2015-04-27 18:39 -0400
Re: Less Is Moore "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2015-04-27 13:26 -1000
Re: Less Is Moore "Rod Pemberton" <bork@lllljunkqwer.cpm> - 2015-04-27 20:11 -0400
Re: Less Is Moore "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2015-04-27 17:59 -1000
Re: Less Is Moore "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2015-05-01 13:39 +1000
csiph-web