Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #36489
| From | rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded, comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link |
| Date | 2015-02-11 22:07 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mbh5dd$m4e$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <mbg0kn$2be$1@dont-email.me> <ZrudnYNOoJS6ckbJnZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 2/11/2015 7:09 PM, Tim Wescott wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:40:27 -0500, rickman wrote: > >> A friend has asked me for help with an idea he has which requires a >> simple RF link to control a 12 volt circuit. One end of the link would >> need an MCU to collect the inputs and make a decision about the state of >> the 12 volt circuit. The RF link is used to control the 12 volt >> circuit. The MCU end would be battery powered and so needs to be low >> energy. It is only on with a very low duty cycle, less than a dozen >> times a day for a short while each time. There may be a need for a >> bidirectional link to verify the serial number of the remote unit, I'm >> not sure. The range is single digit feet, but there may be metal in the >> way, similar to a unit under a car hood for example. >> >> I was originally thinking of using Bluetooth, BLE specifically. But I >> have had some awkwardness with the connection in various uses. One >> advantage is that qualified modules are available which get around the >> FCC certification I believe. I found the NRF51822 Eval Kit which seems >> to be a SOC with both Bluetooth and an ARM CM0, not bad but no certs I >> would assume. >> >> If the remote unit does not need to be identified, I would think there >> are much simpler solutions. I expect the type of xmit and receive >> modules used in weather stations might be adequate. >> >> Any recommendations for units to consider for a prototype? > > Is ZigBee still a viable contender for this sort of stuff? > > If it's really under hood, it sounds like (a) a difficult EMI environment, > and (b) a "whyinhell not just use wired" environment. But I'm sure he has > constraints you haven't mentioned. I don't automatically question all requirements. If they ask for wireless, I'll give them wireless. I didn't say this would go in a car. I said there might be some level of shielding from metal similar to being under the hood, lots of metal, but not shielded like a PC case. The distance is short, so a bit of attenuation from a loose case shouldn't be a problem. I don't know much about ZigBee. I believe it is a lower data rate than Bluetooth which would be fine. The one end needs to be low power and I think Zigbee fits that. I'll do a little digging. But I think that is what BLE is in response to, so there may not be much difference. One nice thing about Bluetooth is there are a million ways to prototype and canned modules with certs are available. -- Rick
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-02-11 11:40 -0500
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2015-02-11 09:46 -0800
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-02-11 11:21 -0800
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2015-02-11 22:51 +0200
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-02-11 22:12 -0500
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2015-02-11 18:09 -0600
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-02-11 22:07 -0500
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2015-02-12 09:55 -0600
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2015-02-12 08:44 -0800
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-02-12 15:04 -0500
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2015-02-12 12:39 -0800
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-02-12 17:16 -0500
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2015-02-12 17:37 -0600
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-02-12 22:32 -0500
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2015-02-13 11:18 -0600
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2015-02-13 11:22 -0800
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link Frnak McKenney <frnak@far.from.the.madding.crowd.com> - 2015-02-14 11:50 -0600
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-02-15 21:49 -0500
Re: Bluetooth or Other Remote Control Link o pere o <me@somewhere.net> - 2015-02-16 09:29 +0100
csiph-web