Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #29593
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.franciliens.net!news.muarf.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!217.188.199.168.MISMATCH!takemy.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) |
| Date | Sat, 12 Apr 2014 22:50:50 +0200 |
| Organization | 1&1 Internet AG |
| Lines | 53 |
| Message-ID | <lic8vb$dv4$1@online.de> (permalink) |
| References | <libs3f$2r2$2@news.albasani.net> <ca9e51d1-059e-4116-8f7c-024b903395e2@googlegroups.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | p4ffb9415.dip0.t-ipconnect.de |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| X-Trace | online.de 1397335851 14308 79.251.148.21 (12 Apr 2014 20:50:51 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@einsundeins.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sat, 12 Apr 2014 20:50:51 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.11.5 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.forth:29593 |
Show key headers only | View raw
mhx@iae.nl wrote:
> On Saturday, April 12, 2014 7:11:11 PM UTC+2, Melzzzzz wrote:
>> Seems that Java bits Forth in optimizing tight loops. Eg division by
>> constant optimization is performed automatically.
>
> [..]
>
> Paraphrased:
>
> ANEW -cumul
>
> #50000000 =: N
> N CELLS ALLOCATE ?ALLOCATE =: addr
>
> : init_cumul ( -- ) addr N 0 ?DO I 3 / I + SWAP !+ LOOP DROP ;
>
> : cumul ( -- )
> addr @+ ( [a] a -- )
> N 1 ?DO
> OVER @ + DUP ( a [a]+x [a]+x -- )
> ROT !+ ( [a]+x a2 -- ) SWAP
> LOOP 2DROP ;
>
> : bench ( xt -- )
> TIMER-RESET
> EXECUTE
> MS? S>F 1e-3 F* N S>F F/ CR F.N1 ." s/op, " .ELAPSED ;
>
> ' init_cumul bench
> ' cumul bench
> CR addr N 1- CELL[] @ .
> addr FREE ?ALLOCATE
>
> \ 3.68 ns/op, 0.186 seconds elapsed.
> \ 2.16 ns/op, 0.109 seconds elapsed.
> \ 1666666616666667 ok
>
> I guess Java programmers are paid per LOC.
That's how I would write cumul (with the original stack effeckt, which
Melzzzzz forgot to write):
: cumul ( addr -- addr )
dup N 1- cells bounds ?do
i @ i cell+ +!
cell +loop ;
--
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
http://bernd-paysan.de/
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-04-12 19:11 +0200
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-12 10:15 -0700
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-04-14 22:15 +0200
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2014-04-14 23:20 +0000
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-04-15 04:18 +0200
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2014-04-15 00:32 -0700
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2014-04-15 11:33 +0000
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-04-15 15:55 +0200
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-04-15 14:44 +0000
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-15 09:00 -0700
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-04-15 19:38 +0200
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) mhx@iae.nl - 2014-04-15 11:41 -0700
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-04-16 07:10 +0200
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-04-16 07:24 +0200
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-04-16 10:24 +0000
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) mhx@iae.nl - 2014-04-12 13:01 -0700
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) mhx@iae.nl - 2014-04-12 13:06 -0700
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-12 15:49 -0700
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) mhx@iae.nl - 2014-04-12 23:00 -0700
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-13 00:14 -0700
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) mhx@iae.nl - 2014-04-13 02:03 -0700
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-04-13 14:52 +0200
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-12 23:45 +0000
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) mhx@iae.nl - 2014-04-12 13:33 -0700
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-04-12 22:50 +0200
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-04-13 03:30 +0200
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-04-13 13:43 +0000
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-04-15 10:05 -0500
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-05 05:46 +0000
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-10 09:50 +0000
Re: Forth vs Java in calculating partial sum ;) "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-10 18:29 +0000
csiph-web