Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #17007
| From | "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: GA144 and test the new word "asd" : speed test |
| Date | 2012-11-03 15:42 +1100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <k727bv$ols$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <3634564f-07d6-47d6-8e31-aa17f1060f72@googlegroups.com> <k6u351$sbp$2@dont-email.me> |
rickman wrote: > ... > Unfortunately this benchmark does not show the GA144 running at optimal > speed which is three times faster. But to get that sort of optimal > utility takes a lot of work to learn how and to do such optimizations. Also to know when the effort is not justified. There may be reasons other than speed for wishing to run Eforth or PolyForth on a GA chip. One would need to ask the folks who implemented them and the intended audience. One hesitates to draw any conclusion from benchmarks involving [nearly] empty loops. Except possibly the futility of them.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
GA144 and test the new word "asd" : speed test emmanuel <emmanuel.said@cern.ch> - 2012-10-31 12:38 -0700
Re: GA144 and test the new word "asd" : speed test Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-11-01 01:13 -0700
Re: GA144 and test the new word "asd" : speed test rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-10-31 21:29 -0400
Re: GA144 and test the new word "asd" : speed test "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-11-03 15:42 +1100
Re: GA144 and test the new word "asd" : speed test David Stubbs <stubbsd@genialgenetics.com> - 2012-11-06 23:28 -0800
Re: GA144 and test the new word "asd" : speed test emmanuel <emmanuel.said@cern.ch> - 2012-11-06 23:49 -0800
Re: GA144 and test the new word "asd" : speed test rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-11-08 10:12 -0500
csiph-web