Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #35125

Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group

Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Date 2014-12-22 22:03 -0800
References (7 earlier) <9ddade33-8b5a-4eab-8191-fc7f2398f0bc@googlegroups.com> <m6qr1m$ctc$1@dont-email.me> <be4b3f6a-1e54-4f9f-b019-7bbb95fab781@googlegroups.com> <86855e78-9964-47b4-9432-651249b8ecc5@googlegroups.com> <m78rko$ito$1@dont-email.me>
Message-ID <cad28ee9-a80b-4b60-9012-75bb227bee4d@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group
From hughaguilar96@gmail.com

Show all headers | View raw

On Monday, December 22, 2014 3:26:55 AM UTC-7, Gerry wrote:
> On 22/12/2014 01:14, hughaguilar96@gmail.com wrote:
> > This code is an example of using a lambda function (the <TOP> function) that accesses the data on the parameter stack of the higher-order function --- it is not anonymous like a quotation, but it supports the basic idea.
> >
> > I would be interested in seeing Gerry Jackson write a version of this program
> 
> Which program? The one you've posted on Rosetta code 
> http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Top_rank_per_group#Forth

Yes --- that one is pretty simple (a linked-list or an array), somewhat real-worldish (more so than most of the RosettaCode problems), and it involves a lambda function that needs access to the upstream data (what your LAMBDA.FTH does).

> Don't hold your breath, I haven't time to even think about it before 
> Christmas and probably the New Year.

I didn't expect you to skip Christmas dinner to do it --- none of this stuff is very important --- do it whenever you get around to it, and I will include it in the next novice-package release (last one was 4 years ago).

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2014-12-08 16:43 -0800
  Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-12-09 05:08 +0100
    Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2014-12-09 21:43 -0800
      Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2014-12-09 21:55 -0800
        Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group november.nihal@gmail.com - 2014-12-10 03:40 -0800
          Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2014-12-11 19:15 -0800
            Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2014-12-13 09:11 -0800
              Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-15 06:08 +0000
              Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-17 02:50 +0000
                Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2014-12-18 22:06 -0800
                Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2014-12-21 17:14 -0800
                Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2014-12-22 10:27 +0000
                Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2014-12-22 22:03 -0800
                Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-01-08 17:17 -0800
                Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2015-01-09 09:56 +0000
                Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-16 19:11 -0700
                Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-24 05:25 +0000
  Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group mix <mix@test.net> - 2014-12-14 11:55 +0000
    Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group empty-buffers <empty.buffersYOU-DONT-WANT-THIS@gmail.NEITHER-THIS.com> - 2014-12-14 13:52 +0000
  Re: Rosetta Code: Top rank per group mix <mix@test.net> - 2014-12-14 11:58 +0000

csiph-web