Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #54850
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-14 06:03 -0800 |
| References | <3cc99bb7-98df-41b6-a313-2e64e8a83e5c@googlegroups.com> <e5ff5dcb-6ac9-46db-9975-ee3bd71926bb@googlegroups.com> <o7v00u$lo7$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <97f17def-4eb6-477a-bc87-e5274a2f5deb@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Dynamic programming in Forth |
| From | lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> |
Den tisdag 14 februari 2017 kl. 14:19:08 UTC+1 skrev David N. Williams: > On 2/14/17 6:53 AM, lehs wrote: > > Last year I started this project to incorporate nested sets in Forth, > > using separate stacks representing sets, in princip, as counted > > bundles of numbers: > > > > n1 ... nk k > > > > To be able to form nested sets (also including ordered n-tuples) the > > bundles are implemented > > > > n1 ... nk -2k for (unordered) sets and > > n1 ... nk -2k-1 for ordered n-tuples. > > > > I'm very pleased with the result as I can program efficiently on a > > higher level now. Of course the code could be much more efficient > > using computer scientific state of the art concepts, but this would > > probably be far more complicated and less general. Using stacks for > > implementing new data structures in Forth is very easy to do and to > > use and results in fairly effective code and code writing. > > > > By know - except from singles, doubles and floating points - I have > > stacks for big integers, nested sets and strings and I have no problem > > with using this. I can remain a productive forther and all the time > > I'm using my inventions. > > I always liked the idea of freely introducing new stacks. They're easy > to do, convenient to use, and can be implemented relatively efficiently. > As far as I'm concerned, stacks are *the* way to do data types in Forth, > as long as it's not overdone. :-) > > -- David I do agree. It's the only way to keep the Forth way of programming, a simple and complete idea of how to manage computing. Other methods would either be more complicated to implement och more complicated to use. I love it and it makes me productive.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Dynamic programming in Forth lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 03:53 -0800
Re: Dynamic programming in Forth "David N. Williams" <williams@umich.edu> - 2017-02-14 08:19 -0500
Re: Dynamic programming in Forth lehs <skydda.barnen@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 06:03 -0800
Re: Dynamic programming in Forth minforth@arcor.de - 2017-02-14 07:44 -0800
Re: Dynamic programming in Forth Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-02-14 16:34 +0000
csiph-web