Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #47379
| Path | csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: How could have I factored this better? |
| Date | Fri, 20 May 2016 18:34:02 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 16 |
| Message-ID | <87shxcchyt.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> (permalink) |
| References | <5e60dbda-f34b-4be0-bfac-d32ddc67062f@googlegroups.com> <871t4we4e3.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <ytydnUY4KviMM6LKnZ2dnUU7-R_NnZ2d@supernews.com> <87wpmock1u.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <tJ-dnU9xKegaL6LKnZ2dnUU7-TnNnZ2d@supernews.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="52eac348160ce62b68e4635eee7cc854"; logging-data="19792"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/83t2TwsyjlFSDFWDb5aS1" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:jxuIWbzwy8nG11AoPuH3on3M20c= sha1:FxZ2I2gYkFVppW7s2Iz/sxLznVA= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.forth:47379 |
Show key headers only | View raw
"Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> writes: >>> shorter, and avoids the need for code to manage the locals frame. > When you declare locals, a locals fram Do you mean extra code generated by the compiler? In this particular case the locals could go in registers, but either way I don't see a big deal unless we're short of code space or something. > To me, the question of whether to check the row length in stars or > solid-box-stars depends on whether stars might be called from > somewhere else. Reasonable enough. In this case stars appeared intended as a directly usable word rather than a factor of solid-box-stars. But my impression is that Forth programs tend to not use anything except possibly naming conventions to prevent words from being globally usable.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How could have I factored this better? Darin Murphy <murphy.darin@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 13:09 -0700
Re: How could have I factored this better? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 16:18 -0400
Re: How could have I factored this better? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-05-20 10:25 -1000
Re: How could have I factored this better? Darin Murphy <murphy.darin@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 13:39 -0700
Re: How could have I factored this better? Darin Murphy <murphy.darin@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 21:33 -0400
Re: How could have I factored this better? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-05-20 10:23 -1000
Re: How could have I factored this better? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-20 15:44 -0700
Re: How could have I factored this better? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-05-20 14:38 -1000
Re: How could have I factored this better? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-20 17:49 -0700
Re: How could have I factored this better? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-05-20 14:57 -1000
Re: How could have I factored this better? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-20 18:34 -0700
Re: How could have I factored this better? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-05-20 16:00 -1000
Re: How could have I factored this better? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-20 20:08 -0700
Re: How could have I factored this better? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-05-20 17:24 -1000
Re: How could have I factored this better? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-05-21 18:15 -0700
Re: How could have I factored this better? Albert van der Horst <albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-05-21 10:01 +0000
Re: How could have I factored this better? Darin Murphy <murphy.darin@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 22:15 -0400
Re: How could have I factored this better? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-05-20 16:46 -1000
Re: How could have I factored this better? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-05-21 18:36 -0700
Re: How could have I factored this better? Darin Murphy <murphy.darin@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 22:51 -0400
Re: How could have I factored this better? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-05-21 22:23 -0700
Re: How could have I factored this better? Darin Murphy <murphy.darin@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 22:43 -0400
Re: How could have I factored this better? Darin Murphy <murphy.darin@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 22:19 -0400
Re: How could have I factored this better? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-21 22:02 +0000
Re: How could have I factored this better? Darin Murphy <murphy.darin@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 22:30 -0400
Re: How could have I factored this better? humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 19:40 -0700
Re: How could have I factored this better? humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 19:38 -0700
Re: How could have I factored this better? Darin Murphy <murphy.darin@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 23:06 -0400
Re: How could have I factored this better? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-21 20:59 -0700
Re: How could have I factored this better? Darin Murphy <murphy.darin@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 03:30 -0400
Re: How could have I factored this better? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2016-05-21 23:14 -1000
Re: How could have I factored this better? humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 03:54 -0700
csiph-web