Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #50791
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: OKAD? |
| Date | 2016-09-09 15:33 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87lgz0k8jh.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <bc52bcf1-4045-425b-bbc4-a0cb0791e2e8@googlegroups.com> <a6031864-c753-4679-98e0-0f0bc59557f0@googlegroups.com> <nqulrq$f85$1@dont-email.me> <1fe82f27-e99d-4809-901a-49c80650c6dd@googlegroups.com> <nqvbi4$1pv$1@dont-email.me> |
rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> writes: > Do you know what process it is developed for? It's been used with a bunch, going back to the F21. The GA processors were made in both 180nm and 130nm. There have been a few other threads about OKAD and the 500LOC is not the whole package, but rather some (important) part, or maybe the part in memory at a given moment. I remember reading that the program was around 250KB but it was in overlays so not much was being run at any moment. Its capabilities seemed comparable to 1980s-era tools like Caesar. You'd hand-layout gates etc. on "tiles" and place tiles by hand, and the tool did some DRC and timing simulation iirc. Lots of chips including (small by today's standards) microprocessors were made that way back then. At higher complexity (like we see now) it may be less manageable. > I recall reading that he didn't use the standard models for > transistors and developed his own. The claim was made that it showed > Spice to be "wrong" whatever that means. The claim was that OKAD modelled transistor temperature and SPICE didn't. But SPICE is definitely capable of doing that. I don't think the code was ever released. I hope they do release it since it doesn't seem to have all that much commercial value these days, and it would be interesting to look at a large Colorforth program.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OKAD? Mux <Yvo.Zoer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 15:07 -0700
Re: OKAD? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-22 15:31 -0700
Re: OKAD? Bernd Linsel <bl1@gmx.com> - 2016-08-23 01:45 +0200
Re: OKAD? Mux <Yvo.Zoer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 13:55 -0700
Re: OKAD? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-09 00:18 -0700
Re: OKAD? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-09 02:47 -0700
Re: OKAD? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 11:52 -0400
Re: OKAD? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-09 10:22 -0700
Re: OKAD? Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 14:57 -0700
Re: OKAD? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 18:02 -0400
Re: OKAD? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-09 15:33 -0700
Re: OKAD? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 01:55 -0400
Re: OKAD? mhx@iae.nl - 2016-09-09 23:36 -0700
Re: OKAD? Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2016-09-12 13:48 -0700
Re: OKAD? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-12 14:17 -0700
Re: OKAD? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-09-13 00:01 +0100
Re: OKAD? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 14:54 -0400
Re: OKAD? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-09-14 08:50 +0100
Re: OKAD? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-14 01:15 -0700
Re: OKAD? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 05:08 -0400
Re: OKAD? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-14 02:14 -0700
Re: OKAD? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-09-14 10:33 +0100
Re: OKAD? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 05:55 -0400
Re: OKAD? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-09-14 11:33 +0100
Re: OKAD? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 13:18 -0400
Re: OKAD? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-09-14 21:02 +0100
Re: OKAD? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 17:20 -0400
Re: OKAD? Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2016-09-15 10:54 -0700
Re: OKAD? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 17:28 -0400
Re: OKAD? Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2016-09-16 10:38 -0700
Re: OKAD? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-17 17:05 -0400
Re: OKAD? Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2016-09-21 13:42 -0700
Re: OKAD? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-09-21 18:03 -0400
Re: OKAD? Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2016-09-23 13:21 -0700
Re: OKAD? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-09-09 14:01 +0200
Re: OKAD? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-09 04:57 -0700
Re: OKAD? Ilya Tarasov <ilya74.tarasov@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 09:18 -0700
Re: OKAD? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-13 10:09 -0700
Re: OKAD? Ilya Tarasov <ilya74.tarasov@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 17:24 -0700
Re: OKAD? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-17 02:38 -0700
csiph-web