Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #41962
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Strings and numbers |
| Date | Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:53:59 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 18 |
| Message-ID | <87k2rwsh2w.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> (permalink) |
| References | <d0c75445-60e3-402a-93a5-8f68501b28ba@googlegroups.com> <87egjjk8kn.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <bc852ff3-f547-4e0c-ab68-72b3e9c25618@googlegroups.com> <mq1tq2$jv0$1@dont-email.me> <msccfm$c7p$1@dont-email.me> <mskosf$1tr$1@dont-email.me> <877fo0t4y0.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <99b72d58-0b1a-4e09-9c34-42ebb844fff8@googlegroups.com> <f8c62977-77d0-47ca-9f21-3c9589ec49a0@googlegroups.com> <87oah9st2o.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <ec7d26f3-8d15-4e8d-a983-7e702b00e4e1@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3a9ed331cf606b0b072b7def4034f06f"; logging-data="5008"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+rcjFoc7by4x0zyTzHpbnY" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:y8t1FJV04GHQqBrxYKgQ0Tn4RJU= sha1:6Oi6HOtkTXzjq8Rqzn7sImC07LU= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.forth:41962 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Richard Todd <richard.wesley.todd@gmail.com> writes: > using an exception for returning a normal value is another kind of > smell, is it not? I actually don't know, and will defer to the Forth gurus about that (I'm far from one). It's idiomatic in Lisp to use catch/throw that way, so I went with it. It's frowned on in Java but I think that's because Java exceptions are slow and heavy. I haven't studied how catch/throw is implemented in Forth but I'm imagining it to be a setjmp/longjmp style mechanism where the catch handlers are linked through the R stack, with the innermost one remembered in a static cell, and the handler mostly just restores the old DP and RP. So if it works that way, it should be lightweight and fast. > I made a pass through it to clean it up. It's basically the same > backtracking search, OK, I'll take a look later.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Strings and numbers Steve Graham <solitary.wanderer52@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 13:24 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 13:51 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-08-03 17:38 -0400
Re: Strings and numbers Steve Graham <solitary.wanderer52@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 14:44 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-08-03 20:59 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers Steve Graham <solitary.wanderer52@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 12:19 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-07 09:29 +0000
Re: Strings and numbers "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-04 15:14 +0000
Re: Strings and numbers "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-07 19:34 +0000
Re: Strings and numbers Julian Fondren <julian.fondren@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 11:48 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-09 00:41 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers Richard Todd <richard.wesley.todd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 00:32 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers Richard Todd <richard.wesley.todd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 10:29 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-10 17:22 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers Richard Todd <richard.wesley.todd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 21:34 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 02:16 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 07:33 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-13 00:12 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers humptydumpty <ouatubi@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 02:09 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-11 15:53 -0700
Re: Strings and numbers Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2015-12-18 16:02 -0600
Re: Strings and numbers "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-12 23:38 +0000
Re: Strings and numbers "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-13 19:41 +0000
Re: Strings and numbers "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-29 18:09 +0000
csiph-web