Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #47078
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: e8th prototype hardware! |
| Date | Fri, 13 May 2016 01:23:21 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 19 |
| Message-ID | <87k2iy4b9i.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> (permalink) |
| References | <nh1ght$3dv$1@dont-email.me> <87posr5kmg.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <nh2a7f$ii$1@dont-email.me> <nh2f7t$jvs$1@dont-email.me> <87lh3f5fiu.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <nh2imo$2h6$1@dont-email.me> <nh2v1d$lrp$1@dont-email.me> <8760ui6gh5.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <nh32hs$vvg$1@dont-email.me> <c72e3745-b0ee-4bb4-945e-cf79d359f898@googlegroups.com> <87oa8a4f4t.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <3d62345e-e850-4c04-b1e5-38a27b8fe3aa@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="52eac348160ce62b68e4635eee7cc854"; logging-data="22407"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+K2sBR31CbQ1GoU80cam7B" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:+LHlQ+uTP/y1Ta1JvFfoORP0cSg= sha1:9iurqSzwqfuSBoXOKXI/mm8pJC8= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.forth:47078 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> writes: > Last time I checked, the 16MBytes was 5x priced :O > BTW, we talk about mega bytes not bits, don't we? Yes, 128 mbit, I didn't realize there was such a cost difference! Now I wonder why the dragonfly board didn't use a 64mbit part instead of 128. Anyway, for the 8th board it doesn't matter, since there is the "infinite" SD card slot. In fact is there a particular reason to use a micro socket instead of full sized, given that the board is fairly large? >> How much power does the board use while this loop is running? > We'll see. I can't have any clue right now. It's too early. Hmm, ok, well I'll be interested in seeing this when available. Is there a way to decrease the system clock speed to save power? I.e. not dynamically but with some kind of boot setting or jumper. To misquote someone, 640 kilohertz ought to be enough for everyone :).
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
e8th prototype hardware! Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 12:01 +0300
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-12 09:03 -0700
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 19:19 +0300
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-05-12 12:44 -0500
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 20:48 +0300
Re: e8th prototype hardware! rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 13:57 -0400
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-12 11:04 -0700
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-12 10:53 -0700
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-05-12 13:43 -0500
Re: e8th prototype hardware! rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 18:14 -0400
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-12 15:47 -0700
Re: e8th prototype hardware! rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 19:14 -0400
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 23:38 -0700
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-12 23:59 -0700
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 00:16 -0700
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 10:31 +0300
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-13 01:23 -0700
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 02:08 -0700
Re: e8th prototype hardware! rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 10:42 -0400
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 08:36 -0700
Re: e8th prototype hardware! rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 11:57 -0400
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-14 12:53 -0700
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2016-05-14 21:41 +0000
Re: e8th prototype hardware! rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 00:08 -0400
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 21:46 -0700
Re: e8th prototype hardware! rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:37 -0400
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 07:26 -0700
Re: e8th prototype hardware! rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 11:26 -0400
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:20 -0700
Re: e8th prototype hardware! rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 17:17 -0400
Re: e8th prototype hardware! Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 22:10 -0700
csiph-web