Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #47598

Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes
Date Sat, 28 May 2016 19:09:15 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 10
Message-ID <87d1o5fwdw.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> (permalink)
References <496341e2-6ac8-4bcc-903e-c9e39e3495ae@googlegroups.com> <2016May28.120710@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="52eac348160ce62b68e4635eee7cc854"; logging-data="5571"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++vFNqcgL46rPTGh0wHnRT"
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:f6HC7ANcZRn4Tv2m8i9XOMooR3g= sha1:GQgWp6qJnKuag+/lGCJ1u/w3Lno=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.forth:47598

Show key headers only | View raw

anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes:
> Or, in the Forth world I used
> more than 4GB for something quite a while ago (IIRC it was
> <https://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/programs/sbpcp.fs>).

If that took more than 1MB or so, then something was terribly wrong ;).

I think it was actually
  http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Hamming_numbers#Forth
since I remember the discussion here.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

32 bit VS 64 bit modes Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-27 11:21 -0700
  Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-27 13:06 -0700
    Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-27 13:22 -0700
      Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-05-27 13:59 -0700
  Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-05-28 10:07 +0000
    Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-28 19:09 -0700
      Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-28 20:00 -0700
      Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes Albert van der Horst <albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2016-05-29 17:46 +0000
        Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-29 11:27 -0700
  Re: 32 bit VS 64 bit modes Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-05-28 23:42 -0400

csiph-web