Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #54512

Re: Memory

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Memory
Date Sat, 28 Jan 2017 20:31:37 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 25
Message-ID <87d1f61o7q.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink)
References <o6dsdm$1tb$1@dont-email.me> <o6ecav$5j0$1@dont-email.me> <87h94i20px.fsf@nightsong.com> <o6jq8e$prg$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d6a6d2a02c20d10462ae7f80899d3f26"; logging-data="26861"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ii3y546s8Drge6ItKtf97"
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:b+y54mhSTYPfviIRm3St5Jsx8Hc= sha1:vLd7fPF3rUbLLsSC5/7jx46tE5o=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.forth:54512

Show key headers only | View raw

Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> writes:
> eForth for the esp8266 is disappointing, eForth usually it's written
> in assembler for the primitives but the esp8266 flavor is not, it's
> written in C which is not the end of the world but on top of that it
> is a token threaded Forth not know for it's speed instead it's used to
> save on memory which the esp8266 has plenty of.

A traditional ITC Forth would be relatively slow too compared with
native code and subroutine threading.  The esp8266 is fast compared to
older MCUs and the even faster ESP32 is available now.  In fact you can
even run Python on the esp8266 (micropython.org).  What are you doing
that makes speed a worry?

> It's not a total loss as it could be useful to quickly port eForth to
> a FPGA CPU, or an oddball CPU.

Is it the one below?  It looks nice to me and I got it running on a PC
without any trouble, iirc:

  http://chiselapp.com/user/tehologist/repository/compc/home

> I'm having some issues with eForth as the tools used don't run under
> Win10 64 bit OS, they were developed with Xp 32 bit version. 

What tools are those?  I'm used to completely self-hosted eforths.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Memory rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-01-26 17:16 -0500
  Re: Memory Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-01-26 20:48 -0600
    Re: Memory minforth@arcor.de - 2017-01-27 03:39 -0800
      Re: Memory Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-01-27 13:27 -0600
        Re: Memory rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-01-27 14:50 -0500
        Re: Memory Alex <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2017-01-27 19:53 +0000
    Re: Memory mhx@iae.nl - 2017-01-28 07:40 -0800
    Re: Memory Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-28 16:01 -0800
      Re: Memory Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-01-28 22:16 -0600
        Re: Memory Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-28 20:31 -0800
          Re: Memory Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-01-29 00:30 -0600
            Re: Memory Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-28 22:39 -0800
              Re: Memory Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2017-01-29 03:19 -0600

csiph-web