Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #51915

Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now?

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now?
Date Sun, 16 Oct 2016 17:17:11 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 18
Message-ID <877f97rfqw.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink)
References <840cddee-749a-4aab-9644-4cfe42371840@googlegroups.com> <5fbfa685-6b97-4f6b-bb09-31f6d7e152f4@googlegroups.com> <49524e24-d693-41a1-b735-f85da37f93ca@googlegroups.com> <20160910133738.7385696c@HP-6550b> <nr1n2k$vbn$1@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl> <87y42zijpi.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <nu0o4t$71u$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8e6c7ef2b9e1ede4343adc0ca1230a9e"; logging-data="11935"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18OlVom6BtLB3GzhYortSa6"
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:Gq3aBuSWIEFyCbjIPMyV6c9TD4c= sha1:RlrZALWmfJN9az4eoW72xUkZnD0=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.forth:51915

Show key headers only | View raw

rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> writes:
> the microbit has gotten cheaper...  Now you can get the board for
> under $15 and the Go kit for under $17.  I assume shipping is extra. ...
> Not sure I need one.  Now that it runs Mecrisp, it could be useful,
> but I have plenty of small MCU boards and no new needs for more.

I guess the microbit's 25 leds are cool but aside from that I still
don't see much interesting about that board.  I believe someone ported
some kind of Forth to the ESP8266.  Lots of people are running
MicroPython or eLua (NodeMCU) on those boards (Wemos D1 etc.) that are
under $3 on Aliexpress.  And of course ESP32 moduels are starting to
arrive.

The 8266 is somewhat lacking in i/o, the ESP32 has more, and the ARM
board I linked earlier has a ton.  It's basically a clone of the Maple
Mini and lots of people are using them.  I keep wanting to order a few
on general principles but will try to resist.  I still have a couple of
Stellaris Launchpads sitting around doing nothing.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-09-07 11:24 -0500
  Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-08 11:57 -0700
    Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-09-09 13:48 -0700
      Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-10 00:19 -0700
        Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-09-10 00:48 -0700
          Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-10 04:06 -0700
            Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-09-10 13:37 +0100
              Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-10 08:47 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-10 11:45 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-09-10 21:44 +0200
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-09-10 15:10 -0500
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-09-10 19:24 -0700
              Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-09-10 21:31 +0200
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-10 13:27 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 16:32 -0400
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 16:37 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 19:46 -0400
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 18:40 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 22:20 -0400
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 15:30 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-18 16:42 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 18:30 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-10-18 23:23 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 03:23 -0400
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-19 00:51 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-19 01:08 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-19 17:19 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-20 00:43 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-10-20 10:00 +0100
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 19:09 -0400
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-10-21 13:14 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-21 16:31 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 14:28 -0400
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-22 12:14 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-12-22 02:21 -0800
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-12-23 11:47 -0800
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 15:07 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-22 00:09 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-16 17:17 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-09-10 22:10 +0100
            Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-09-10 10:58 -0500
              Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-11 00:03 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-11 01:10 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-09-11 11:23 +0200
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-11 12:27 -0700
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-09-11 14:57 -0500
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-09-11 05:13 -0500
                Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-11 04:51 -0700

csiph-web