Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #20658
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Quotations revisited |
| References | <00808889968435@frunobulax.edu> <50040282.189860346@192.168.0.50> <771c3aa0-0b95-48af-b0fb-c6ae6269a266@googlegroups.com> <khpp9q$2r0$1@online.de> |
| From | Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> |
| Organization | nocrew |
| Date | 2013-03-14 09:47 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <85ip4ue5aw.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> (permalink) |
Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> writes: > However, I'm not convinced that we want closures as persistent > objects - we already have create does> for that. The only reason to > use closures instead of Create DOES> for persistent stuff is that > they may be more comfortable to write. I'm toying with this possible CREATE-DOES>-style combination of closures and quotations: : counter ( n -- xt ) ( xt: n1 -- n2 ) dup . [create , does> tuck +! @ ;] ." is enclosed" ; ok 100 counter value f 100 is enclosed ok 1 f execute . 101 ok 2 f execute . 103 ok 42 counter value g 42 is enclosed ok 1 g execute . 43 ok 3 f execute . 106 ok
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Quotations revisited Michael L Gassanenko <m_l_g3@yahoo.com> - 2013-03-13 01:54 -0700
Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-13 04:21 -0500
Re: Quotations revisited Michael L Gassanenko <m_l_g3@yahoo.com> - 2013-03-13 03:36 -0700
Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-13 07:14 -0500
Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-13 11:55 +0000
Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-13 07:20 -0500
Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-13 14:36 +0000
Re: Quotations revisited albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-03-13 13:01 +0000
Re: Quotations revisited anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-13 14:21 +0000
Re: Quotations revisited David Kuehling <dvdkhlng@gmx.de> - 2013-03-13 10:33 +0100
Re: Quotations revisited Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-13 04:41 -0500
Re: Quotations revisited David Kuehling <dvdkhlng@gmx.de> - 2013-03-13 11:44 +0100
Re: Quotations revisited Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2013-03-13 11:23 +0100
Re: Quotations revisited Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-13 12:52 +0100
Re: Quotations revisited Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2013-03-14 09:47 +0100
Re: Quotations revisited Sieur de Bienville <morrimichael@gmail.com> - 2013-03-14 10:45 -0700
Re: Quotations revisited Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2013-03-14 19:41 +0100
Re: Quotations revisited Sieur de Bienville <morrimichael@gmail.com> - 2013-03-14 12:58 -0700
Re: Quotations revisited Michael L Gassanenko <m_l_g3@yahoo.com> - 2013-03-14 23:09 -0700
csiph-web