Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #17410
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Windows8 |
| References | (8 earlier) <50aaad2a$0$289$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <7xfw45use4.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <50aab904$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <7xsj8518zb.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <50aac4a6$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Date | 2012-11-19 16:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7xpq39w2h9.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> (permalink) |
| Organization | Nightsong/Fort GNOX |
Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> writes: > A Forth GC implementation must have a memory and speed hit of its > own. You're not likely to convince me to use GC because the problems I > solve don't require it. The only Forth GC that I know of is Anton's, which is a Boehm-style conservative collector that scans the entire heap for anything that might be a pointer, so its speed hit per collection is O(N) in the total size of the strings. Its space hit is small, maybe a bit or a cell in each allocated object regardless of object size (not sure). Your copying approach is potentially much worse, like O(N*K) where K is the number of copies made, and K could potentially itself be O(N), making the whole thing O(N**2); and it is both a speed hit and a space hit of that magnitude. Whether the speed hit is worse depends of course on collection frequency. A more advanced GC usually doesn't scan the heap, but instead just traces the pointers and copies the live data, so it's basically O(M) in the live data size at each collection, where M is often much smaller than N. With this type of GC, allocation is similar to ALLOT (i.e. it just bumps a pointer) and freeing most objects takes zero time (since the GC doesn't touch dead objects). GC is often faster than traditional allocate/free for that reason. > Perhaps others who have used Forth and GC could comment on what GC > code they use and how that has worked out for them. I've read > negative comments about that. I'd be interested in hearing experiences too. I think GC is not really a perfect fit for Forth, but it does exist and apparently gets used sometimes. I think for the sorts of problems that benefit a lot from relying heavily on GC, Forth itself may not be that good a fit. Forth with GC is sort of an in-between area and I was surprised to find out about it.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Windows8 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2012-11-02 08:41 -0700
Re: Windows8 Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2012-11-02 11:12 -0700
Re: Windows8 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2012-11-06 09:05 -0800
Re: Windows8 Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2012-11-12 07:10 -0800
Re: Windows8 stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-11-12 17:27 +0000
Re: Windows8 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2012-11-21 17:48 -0800
Re: Windows8 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2012-11-07 20:44 -0800
Re: Windows8 Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2012-11-12 07:15 -0800
Re: Windows8 Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2012-11-12 07:59 -0800
Re: Windows8 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-11-12 07:55 -1000
Re: Windows8 "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-11-14 20:04 +1100
Re: Windows8 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-11-14 17:01 +0000
Re: Windows8 "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2012-11-18 11:14 +1100
Re: Windows8 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-11-19 14:25 +0000
Re: Windows8 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-11-19 08:09 -1000
Re: Windows8 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-11-20 09:55 +0000
Re: Windows8 mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-11-25 10:56 +0200
Re: Windows8 Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-11-25 16:46 +0100
Re: Windows8 Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-11-19 16:21 -0500
Re: Windows8 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-11-19 13:46 -0800
Re: Windows8 Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-11-19 17:05 -0500
Re: Windows8 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-11-19 12:14 -1000
Re: Windows8 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-11-19 14:30 -0800
Re: Windows8 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-11-19 12:53 -1000
Re: Windows8 Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-11-19 17:44 -0500
Re: Windows8 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-11-19 14:52 -0800
GC (was Re: Windows8) Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-11-26 11:44 -0500
Re: GC Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-11-26 11:44 -0800
Re: GC Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-11-28 06:35 -0500
Re: GC Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-11-29 11:58 -0800
Re: GC albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2012-11-30 01:46 +0000
Re: GC Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-11-29 21:14 -0800
Re: Windows8 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-11-19 14:42 -0800
Re: Windows8 Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-11-19 17:56 -0500
Re: Windows8 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-11-19 15:14 -0800
Re: Windows8 Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-11-19 18:45 -0500
Re: Windows8 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-11-19 14:18 -1000
Re: Windows8 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-11-19 16:18 -0800
Re: Windows8 Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-11-19 19:01 -0500
Re: Windows8 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-11-19 12:58 -1000
Re: Windows8 Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-11-20 02:23 +0100
Re: Windows8 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-11-20 10:48 +0000
Re: Windows8 Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-11-20 07:56 -0800
Re: Windows8 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-11-21 15:03 +0000
Re: Windows8 Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-11-23 05:58 -0800
Re: Windows8 Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2012-11-20 02:13 -0800
Re: Windows8 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-11-20 08:57 -0800
Re: Windows8 "David N. Williams" <williams@umich.edu> - 2012-11-20 16:56 -0500
Re: Windows8 mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2012-11-25 11:20 +0200
Re: Windows8 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-11-14 16:36 -0500
Re: Windows8 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-11-14 12:12 -1000
Re: Windows8 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-11-14 17:46 -0500
Re: Windows8 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-11-14 13:12 -1000
Re: Windows8 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-11-14 18:12 -0800
Re: Windows8 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-11-15 13:55 -0500
Re: Windows8 RR <freedomspyder@gmail.com> - 2012-11-15 16:03 -0800
Re: Windows8 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-11-15 21:54 -0500
Re: Windows8 RR <freedomspyder@gmail.com> - 2012-11-15 19:26 -0800
Re: Windows8 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-11-15 19:27 -0800
Re: Windows8 Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-11-16 17:45 +0100
Re: Windows8 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-11-16 09:10 -0800
Re: Windows8 Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-11-16 22:34 +0100
Re: Windows8 Andy Valencia <vandys@vsta.org> - 2012-11-16 18:06 +0000
Re: Windows8 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-11-16 11:09 -0800
Re: Windows8 Spam@ControlQ.com - 2012-11-16 15:18 -0500
Re: Windows8 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2012-11-15 00:19 -0800
Re: Windows8 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-11-14 22:55 -1000
Re: Windows8 albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2012-11-15 12:20 +0000
Re: Windows8 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2012-11-15 08:32 -0800
Re: Windows8 kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk - 2012-11-16 04:51 -0600
Re: Windows8 stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-11-16 13:46 +0000
Re: Windows8 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2012-11-16 08:12 -0800
Re: Windows8 the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2012-11-29 00:16 -0800
csiph-web