Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #135503

Re: writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C)

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix6.panix.com!nan.users.panix.com!robomod!not-for-mail
From dxf <dxforth@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth, comp.ai
Subject Re: writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C)
Date Tue, 1 Sep 2026 07:59:58 EDT
Organization Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net
Approved comp.ai Approval Key <comp-ai-approval-key@nan.users.panix.com>
Message-ID <6a9658dd$1@news.ausics.net> (permalink)
References <11706u3$3obgi$1@dont-email.me> <87h5kb540e.fsf@debian>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Injection-Info reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix6.panix.com:166.84.1.6"; logging-data="22938"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
User-Agent Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Comp-AI-Policy https://logological.org/comp.ai
X-Comp-AI-Info-1 Send submissions to comp-ai@nan.users.panix.com
X-Comp-AI-Info-2 Send technical complaints to comp-ai-request@nan.users.panix.com
X-Comp-AI-Info-3 Send complaints about policy to comp-ai-request@nan.users.panix.com
X-Comp-AI-Info-4 GnuPG Public Key at https://logological.org/81A27838.txt
X-Comment-1 The moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this article.
X-Comment-2 Moderators do not verify the accuracy of posted information.
X-Comment-3 Acceptance does not convey approval of any external references.
X-Robomod STUMP by ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov), C++/Perl/Unix Consulting
X-Moderation-1 See https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/stump
X-Spam-Relay-Country DE AU **
X-Spam-DCC :
Authentication-Results mail2.panix.com; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results mail2.panix.com; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=fox.ausics.net
Content-Language en-GB
Old-NNTP-Posting-Host news.ausics.net
X-Complaints abuse@ausics.net
X-Auth PGPMoose V2.0 PGP comp.ai iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJqlr4+AAoJEKl0hmeBong40lAH/iNt2JO9wgyJucl+FC6CjlUd mMwdxyQ05c19BsnllasJ5QOfXtCkcNQ2kjNmRzffLAV45+shE6SGgOMwhzXc5u8k 3YBA4fASkw4jB4IrACYHk6cg2U3ge8HDLe3L6eTwBbZYuSjDo90VYNwvS4C9OXpG Wc1pRNEplz3kcZ4ZF3cAhz2hXy5mZidbAccr/cnuuAW9MSV6FeKcyT6rMHZZf62T 5CnAMLZi1SwMloNgB1dSquye6caAfENUhSw9+03Nx2EoSUFufNUlwC7767MAZ3dR yIb9jNJqUqv5IRdOjXTLCTd7OZogYX11laH4ID51fgMarLl3NkhcNanLlqIy7OE= =0mge
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.forth:135503 comp.ai:377

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


On 31/08/2026 11:17 pm, Kragen Javier Sitaker wrote:
> ... 
> While it’s true that the text above this remark (some of which I’ve
> quoted below) is pretty clear, it’s also pretty obviously AI, and it has
> a certain characteristic that is widespread in AI-generated texts which
> is pretty offputting: it frequently exaggerates to the point of
> falsehood in a sort of slick salesman way, which inspires distrust in
> the sort of people who think about things.

Don't know whether you're talking to a human or a machine?  It's the
ultimate isolation - communicating through AI's.  I don't think humans
appreciate there won't be any need for what little thinking they
currently do.  Doomed to endless entertainment.  At 70 it hardly matters
but not for young person.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Only Forth For Livecheck, No C Terry Porter <techman001@eternal-september.org> - 2026-08-30 03:09 +0000
  writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-08-31 09:17 -0400
    Re: writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C) Terry Porter <techman001@eternal-september.org> - 2026-08-31 21:39 +0000
      Re: writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-11 14:30 -0300
        Re: writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C) Terry Porter <techman001@eternal-september.org> - 2026-09-12 09:36 +0000
    Re: writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C) dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 07:59 -0400
      Re: writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C) marcel hendrix <mhx@iae.nl> - 2026-09-01 13:34 -0400
        Re: writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C) dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-09-02 17:08 +1000
        Re: writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C) antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-09-02 11:52 -0400
          Re: writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C) albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2026-09-02 20:09 +0200
      Re: writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-01 13:34 -0400
    Re: writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C) Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2026-09-07 12:43 +0200
      Re: writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-11 15:31 -0300
        Re: writing style with AI (was Re: Only Forth For Livecheck, No C) Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2026-09-15 19:58 +0200

csiph-web