Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #28110
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-26 10:40 -0800 |
| References | <4LKdne1GpOo0U3nPnZ2dnUVZ_hednZ2d@supernews.com> |
| Message-ID | <5f006bb8-e2f4-45bf-ad44-125e895fbce9@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: [OT?] Would journalists be preffered documenters? |
| From | trebor.english@gmail.com |
On Saturday, January 25, 2014 12:52:34 PM UTC-5, Richard Owlett wrote: > Documentation is a recurring topic on this group > Where I worked in 2000 - 2001 the technical writing group was only two people. I brought them a copy of a page that, as I recall, was a list of about 10 rules for journalists. The two rules I found most memorable are: - Remember to never split an infinitive. - Eschew obfuscation. They found the list fascinating and entertaining. Real journalists might have been exposed to those concepts previously. Librarians are another group with language experience who might be useful in the generation of documentation. At least they would have skill in proof reading.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[OT?] Would journalists be preffered documenters? Richard Owlett <rowlett@pcnetinc.com> - 2014-01-25 11:52 -0600 Re: [OT?] Would journalists be preffered documenters? Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2014-01-26 10:30 +0000 Re: [OT?] Would journalists be preffered documenters? trebor.english@gmail.com - 2014-01-26 10:40 -0800 Re: [OT?] Would journalists be preffered documenters? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-01-26 12:47 -1000 Re: [OT?] Would journalists be preffered documenters? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2014-01-27 14:51 +0000 Re: [OT?] Would journalists be preffered documenters? Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> - 2014-01-28 10:40 +0100
csiph-web